» Articles » PMID: 29270369

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Surgical Outcomes in Marfan Patients Undergoing Aortic Root Surgery by Composite-valve Graft or Valve Sparing Root Replacement

Overview
Date 2017 Dec 23
PMID 29270369
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A major, life-limiting feature of Marfan syndrome (MFS) is the presence of aneurysmal disease. Cardiovascular intervention has dramatically improved the life expectancy of Marfan patients. Traditionally, the management of aortic root disease has been undertaken with composite-valve graft replacing the aortic valve and proximal aorta; more recently, valve sparing procedures have been developed to avoid the need for anticoagulation. This meta-analysis assesses the important surgical outcomes of the two surgical techniques.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies reporting the outcomes of aortic root surgery in Marfan patients with data extracted for outcomes of early and late mortality, thromboembolic events, late bleeding complications and surgical reintervention rates.

Results: The outcomes of 2,976 Marfan patients undergoing aortic root surgery were analysed, 1,624 patients were treated with composite valve graft (CVG) and 1,352 patients were treated with valve sparing root replacement (VSRR). When compared against CVG, VSRR was associated with reduced risk of thromboembolism (OR =0.32; 95% CI, 0.16-0.62, P=0.0008), late hemorrhagic complications (OR =0.18; 95% CI, 0.07-0.45; P=0.0003) and endocarditis (OR =0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.68; P=0.006). Importantly there was no significant difference in reintervention rates between VSRR and CVG (OR =0.89; 95% CI, 0.35-2.24; P=0.80).

Conclusions: There is an increasing body of evidence that VSRR can be reliably performed in Marfan patients, resulting in a durable repair with no increased risk of re-operation compared to CVG, thus avoiding the need for systemic anticoagulation in selected patients.

Citing Articles

Mechanical Valves: Past, Present, and Future-A Review.

Leviner D, Abraham D, Ronai T, Sharoni E J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999334 PMC: 11242849. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133768.


Outcomes of aortic root replacement in patients with Marfan syndrome: the role of valve-sparing and valve-replacing approaches.

Coselli J, Volguina I, Nguyen L, Green S, LeMaire S, Moon M Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023; 12(4):338-349.

PMID: 37554715 PMC: 10405346. DOI: 10.21037/acs-2023-avs2-0085.


2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Isselbacher E, Preventza O, Hamilton Black 3rd J, Augoustides J, Beck A, Bolen M J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023; 166(5):e182-e331.

PMID: 37389507 PMC: 10784847. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.04.023.


Is valve-sparing aortic root replacement better than total aortic root replacement? An overview of reviews.

Wang W, Zhang X, Shi Y, Xu S, Shi T, Han X Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1115290.

PMID: 37144057 PMC: 10152366. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1115290.


Matched comparison between external aortic root support and valve-sparing root replacement.

Van Hoof L, Lamberigts M, Noe D, El-Hamamsy I, Lansac E, Kluin J Heart. 2023; 109(11):832-838.

PMID: 36650042 PMC: 10313978. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321840.


References
1.
Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Di Bartolomeo R, Eggebrecht H . 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the.... Eur Heart J. 2014; 35(41):2873-926. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281. View

2.
Coselli J, Volguina I, LeMaire S, Sundt T, Connolly H, Stephens E . Early and 1-year outcomes of aortic root surgery in patients with Marfan syndrome: a prospective, multicenter, comparative study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 147(6):1758-66, 1767.e1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.021. View

3.
Kari F, Beyersdorf F, Rylski B, Stephens E, Russe M, Siepe M . David I reimplantation procedure for aortic root replacement in Marfan patients: medium-term outcome. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014; 19(5):743-8. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu244. View

4.
Hu R, Wang Z, Hu X, Wu H, Wu Z, Zhou Z . Surgical reconstruction of aortic root in Marfan syndrome patients: a systematic review. J Heart Valve Dis. 2015; 23(4):473-83. View

5.
Zehr K, Matloobi A, Connolly H, Orszulak T, Puga F, Schaff H . Surgical management of the aortic root in patients with Marfan syndrome. J Heart Valve Dis. 2005; 14(1):121-8. View