» Articles » PMID: 29269198

Car Seat Tolerance Screening in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Failure Rates, Risk Factors, and Adverse Outcomes

Overview
Journal J Pediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2017 Dec 23
PMID 29269198
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To characterize the epidemiology of Car Seat Tolerance Screening (CSTS) failure and the association between test failure and all-cause 30-day postdischarge mortality or hospital readmission in a large, multicenter cohort of preterm infants receiving neonatal intensive care.

Study Design: This retrospective cohort study used the prospectively collected Optum Neonatal Database. Study infants were born at <37 weeks of gestation between 2010 and 2016. We identified independent predictors of CSTS failure and calculated the risk-adjusted odds of all-cause 30-day mortality or hospital readmission associated with test failure.

Results: Of 7899 infants cared for in 788 hospitals, 334 (4.2%) failed initial CSTS. Greater postmenstrual age at testing and African American race were independently associated with decreased failure risk. Any treatment with an antacid medication, concurrent use of caffeine or supplemental oxygen, and a history of failing a trial off respiratory support were associated with increased failure risk. The mean adjusted post-CSTS duration of hospitalization was 3.1 days longer (95% CI, 2.7-3.6) among the infants who failed the initial screening. Rates of 30-day all-cause mortality or readmission were higher among infants who failed the CSTS (2.4% vs 1.0%; P = .03); however, the difference was not significant after confounder adjustment (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.11-1.31).

Conclusion: CSTS failure was associated with longer post-test hospitalization but no difference in the risk-adjusted odds for 30-day mortality or hospital readmission. Whether CSTS failure unnecessarily prolongs hospitalization or results in appropriate care that prevents adverse postdischarge outcomes is unknown. Further research is needed to address this knowledge gap.

Citing Articles

The Association Between Routine Car Seat Screening and Subsequent Health Care Utilization.

Harrison W, Ritter V, Flower K, Seashore C, McLaurin-Jiang S Hosp Pediatr. 2022; 12(11):913-922.

PMID: 36189493 PMC: 9647635. DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006509.


Adherence to Car Seat Tolerance Screening Differs by Indication and Patient Characteristics.

McLaurin-Jiang S, Weinberger M, Ritter V, OShea T, Flower K Matern Child Health J. 2021; 25(11):1707-1716.

PMID: 34403071 PMC: 8369874. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03220-5.


Cerebral oxygenation monitoring of ex-preterm infants during the infant car seat challenge test.

Farooqui M, Srinivasan G, Ethawi Y, Alvaro R, Baier J, Narvey M Paediatr Child Health. 2021; 25(5):16-19.

PMID: 33628076 PMC: 7890933. DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxy176.

References
1.
Ojadi V, Petrova A, Mehta R, Hegyi T . Risk of cardio-respiratory abnormalities in preterm infants placed in car seats: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2005; 5:28. PMC: 1183222. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-5-28. View

2.
Pilley E, McGuire W . Pre-discharge "car seat challenge" for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; (1):CD005386. PMC: 9016792. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005386.pub2. View

3.
Davis N, Gregory M, Rhein L . Test-retest reliability of the infant car-seat challenge. J Perinatol. 2013; 34(1):54-8. PMC: 10016367. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2013.118. View

4.
Pilley E, McGuire W . The car seat: a challenge too far for preterm infants?. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005; 90(6):F452-5. PMC: 1721968. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2004.064295. View

5.
Mackie A, Ionescu-Ittu R, Pilote L, Rahme E, Marelli A . Hospital readmissions in children with congenital heart disease: a population-based study. Am Heart J. 2008; 155(3):577-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.003. View