» Articles » PMID: 29268749

Process-oriented Evaluation of an International Faculty Development Program for Asian Developing Countries: a Qualitative Study

Overview
Journal BMC Med Educ
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2017 Dec 23
PMID 29268749
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Non-English-speaking developing countries in Southeast Asia have been provided only limited opportunities for faculty development in the education of health professions. Although there exist a few programs that have been shown to be effective, they are frequently presented with few explanations on how and why the programs work due to their outcome-oriented nature. This study explores the process of the Lee Jong-Wook Fellowship for Health Professional Education, an international faculty development program designed for capacity building of educators of health professions in Southeast Asian developing countries.

Methods: Fellows were from Cambodia, Myanmar, and Laos. Qualitative data were collected from two types of semi-structured interviews - group and individual. Thematic analysis was conducted to explore the factors related to the effectiveness of the program, framed by four components of faculty development, which included context, facilitators, program, and participants.

Results: From the thematic analysis, the authors identified a total of 12 themes in the four components of faculty development. In the context domain, the resource-poor setting, a culture that puts emphasis on hierarchy and seniority, and educational environment depending on individual commitment rather than broad consensus emerged as key factors. In the facilitators domain, their teaching methods and materials, mutual understanding between teacher and learner, and collaboration between facilitators mainly influenced the learning during the fellowship. In the program domain, the key advantages of the fellowship program were its applicability to the workplace of the fellows and enough allowed time for practice and reflection. Finally, in the participants domain, Fellows valued their heterogeneity of composition and recognized cognitive as well as non-cognitive attributes of the participants as essential.

Conclusions: This process-oriented evaluation reveals the diverse factors that contributed to achieving the intended outcomes of the fellowship. Although much evidence from best practices in faculty development are still valid, the findings suggest that the selection strategies, learning environment, and English communication should be given more consideration when organizing a program targeting these people and cultures. A comprehensive understanding of the process would contribute to developing tailored strategies for educators of health professions in developing countries in similar settings.

Citing Articles

Current status and challenges of faculty development in Korean medical education and strategies for advancement.

Lee D Korean J Med Educ. 2024; 36(4):415-427.

PMID: 39639636 PMC: 11625904. DOI: 10.3946/kjme.2024.314.


Understanding the capacity development of faculty development programs: a sequential explanatory mixed methods study.

Salajegheh M, Sandars J, Mirzazadeh A, Gandomkar R BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):744.

PMID: 38987781 PMC: 11234744. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05715-5.


Understanding competency of nursing students in the course of case-based learning in Cambodia: a convergent mixed method study.

Koto-Shimada K, Carandang R, Shibanuma A, Kiriya J, Ong K, Touch S BMC Nurs. 2023; 22(1):265.

PMID: 37568231 PMC: 10416455. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01420-8.


Understanding and Embracing Culture in International Faculty Development.

Mortaz Hejri S, Vyas R, Burdick W, Steinert Y Perspect Med Educ. 2023; 12(1):1-11.

PMID: 36908745 PMC: 9997115. DOI: 10.5334/pme.31.


Needs assessment for faculty development in dental education, at the University of Health Sciences, Lao PDR.

Khounyotha T, Yeh B, Lee S, Lee C, Park K Korean J Med Educ. 2022; 34(4):327-336.

PMID: 36464903 PMC: 9726232. DOI: 10.3946/kjme.2022.241.


References
1.
Tweed R, Lehman D . Learning considered within a cultural context. Confucian and Socratic approaches. Am Psychol. 2002; 57(2):89-99. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.57.2.89. View

2.
Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M . A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach. 2006; 28(6):497-526. DOI: 10.1080/01421590600902976. View

3.
Frambach J, Driessen E, Chan L, van der Vleuten C . Rethinking the globalisation of problem-based learning: how culture challenges self-directed learning. Med Educ. 2012; 46(8):738-47. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04290.x. View

4.
Coates W, Runde D, Yarris L, Rougas S, Guth T, Santen S . Creating a Cadre of Fellowship-Trained Medical Educators: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Development Program Leaders' Perspectives and Advice. Acad Med. 2016; 91(12):1696-1704. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001097. View

5.
Ridde V, Fournier P, Banza B, Tourigny C, Ouedraogo D . Programme evaluation training for health professionals in francophone Africa: process, competence acquisition and use. Hum Resour Health. 2009; 7:3. PMC: 2647897. DOI: 10.1186/1478-4491-7-3. View