Effect of Diets with Different Energy and Lipase Levels on Performance, Digestibility and Carcass Trait in Broilers
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: A 28-d trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of diets with different energy and lipase levels on performance, nutrient digestibility, serum profiles, gut health, and carcass quality in broilers.
Methods: A total of 720 one-day-old male Ross 308 broilers (45.4±0.5 g) were randomly assigned to one of the following four treatments: i) RET, reduced energy treatment (metabolizable energy = 2,950 and 3,100 kcal/kg for starter and finisher diet), ii) BDT, basal diet treatment (metabolizable energy = 3,050 and 3,200 kcal/kg for starter and finisher diet, iii) RET015, RET+0.15 g/kg lipase, and iv) RET03, RET+0.3 g/kg lipase. There were 10 replications (cages) per treatment with 18 birds per cage.
Results: During d 1 to 14, broilers fed BDT, RET015, and RET03 diets had higher (p<0.05) body weight gain than those fed RET diet. During d 1 to 14, 15 to 28 and the overall experiment, feed conversion ratio in RET03 treatment was lower (p<0.05) compared with RET treatment. On d 14, the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of dry matter (DM), ether extract (EE), and gross energy in RET03 treatment was higher (p<0.05) than those in RET treatment, while the ATTD of N was increased (p<0.05) by RET03 treatment. On d 28, broilers fed RET03 diet had higher (p<0.05) ATTD of DM than those fed RET and RET015 diets, while the ATTD of EE in BDT and RET03 treatments was increased (p<0.05) compared with RET and RET015 treatments. Broilers fed RET03 diet had higher villus height (VH) and VH:crypt depth (CD) ratio than those fed RET and BDT diets. The activity of pancreatic lipase in BDT and RET03 treatments was higher (p<0.05) than that in RET treatment.
Conclusion: Taken together, lipase supplementation (3,000 U/kg feed) increased growth performance, nutrient digestibility, VH, VH:CD ratio and lipase activity, but decreased triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the abdominal fat percentage in broilers fed reduced energy diet.
Yu Y, Ai C, Luo C, Yuan J Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(13).
PMID: 39000537 PMC: 11242162. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25137431.
Ahmad A, Mughal G, Abro R, Bughio S, Rizwana H, Leghari I Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(4).
PMID: 36830524 PMC: 9952789. DOI: 10.3390/ani13040737.
Hernandez-Patlan D, Solis-Cruz B, Latorre J, Merino-Guzman R, Morales Rodriguez M, Ausland C Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:784387.
PMID: 35274019 PMC: 8902298. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.784387.
Kwak M, Choi S, Choi Y, Lee H, Park M, Whang K Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(5).
PMID: 35268204 PMC: 8909290. DOI: 10.3390/ani12050635.
Wickramasuriya S, Macelline S, Cho H, Hong J, Park S, Heo J Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7:583998.
PMID: 33195607 PMC: 7536262. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.583998.