» Articles » PMID: 29267606

Pre-validation Study of the Brazilian Version of the Disruptions in Surgery Index (DiSI) As a Safety Tool in Cardiothoracic Surgery

Abstract

Introduction: Most risk stratification scores used in surgery do not include external and non-technical factors as predictors of morbidity and mortality.

Objective: The present study aimed to translate and adapt transculturally the Brazilian version of the Disruptions in Surgery Index (DiSI) questionnaire, which was developed to capture the self-perception of each member of the surgical team regarding the disruptions that may contribute to error and obstruction of safe surgical flow.

Methods: A universalist approach was adopted to evaluate the conceptual equivalence of items and semantics, which included the following stages: (1) translation of the questionnaire into Portuguese; (2) back translation into English; (3) panel of experts to draft the preliminary version; and (4) pre-test for evaluation of verbal comprehension by the target population of 43 professionals working in cardiothoracic surgery.

Results: The questionnaire was translated into Portuguese and its final version with 29 items obtained 89.6% approval from the panel of experts. The target population evaluated all items as easy to understand. The mean overall clarity and verbal comprehension observed in the pre-test reached 4.48 ± 0.16 out of the maximum value of 5 on the psychometric Likert scale.

Conclusion: Based on the methodology used, the experts' analysis and the results of the pre-test, it is concluded that the essential stages of translation and cross-cultural adaptation of DiSI to the Portuguese language were satisfactorily fulfilled in this study.

Citing Articles

Applicability of the Disruptions in Surgery Index in the Cardiovascular Management Scenarios - A Marker for Developing Functionally Efficient Teams.

Nina V, Mendes A, Sevdalis N, Marath A, Mejia O, Brandao C Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2021; 36(4):445-452.

PMID: 34617425 PMC: 8522325. DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0685.

References
1.
Carvalho A, Santos Garcia J, Silva T, Ribeiro J . Translation and transcultural adaptation of Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) to Brazilian version. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016; 66(1):94-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.10.018. View

2.
Kalender M, Baysal A, Karaca O, Boyacioglu K, Kayalar N . Validation of German Aortic Valve Score in a Multi-Surgeon Single Center. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 32(2):77-82. PMC: 5409257. DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2016-0029. View

3.
Meyer G, Battles J, Hart J, Tang N . The US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's activities in patient safety research. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003; 15 Suppl 1:i25-30. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg068. View

4.
Mishra A, Catchpole K, Dale T, McCulloch P . The influence of non-technical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2007; 22(1):68-73. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9346-1. View

5.
Sevdalis N, Hull L, Birnbach D . Improving patient safety in the operating theatre and perioperative care: obstacles, interventions, and priorities for accelerating progress. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109 Suppl 1:i3-i16. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes391. View