» Articles » PMID: 29265477

There's No Place Like Home: 35-year Patient Survival on Home Hemodialysis

Overview
Journal Semin Dial
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2017 Dec 22
PMID 29265477
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The vast majority of maintenance dialysis patients suffer from poor long-term survival rates and lower levels of health-related quality of life. However, home hemodialysis is a historically significant dialysis modality that has been associated with favorable outcomes as well as greater patient autonomy and control, yet only represents a small minority of the total dialysis performed in the United States. Some potential disadvantages of home hemodialysis include vascular access complications, infection-related hospitalizations, patient fatigue, and attrition. In addition, current barriers and challenges in expanding the utilization of this modality include limited patient and provider education and technical expertise. Here we report a 65-year old male with end-stage renal disease due to Alport's syndrome who has undergone 35 years of uninterrupted thrice-weekly home hemodialysis (ie, every Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday evening, each session lasting 3 to 3¼ hours in length) using a conventional hemodialysis machine who has maintained a high functional status allowing him to work 6-8 hours per day. The patient has been able to liberalize his dietary and fluid intake while only requiring 3-4 liters of ultrafiltration per treatment, despite having absence of residual kidney function. Through this case of extraordinary longevity and outcomes after 35 years of dialysis and a review of the literature, we illustrate the history of home hemodialysis, its significant clinical and psychosocial advantages, as well as the barriers that hinder its widespread adaptation.

Citing Articles

Knowledge, attitudes, and practice toward sarcopenia among maintenance dialysis patients in Anhui, China.

Zhao Q, Yang X, Bao M, Zhang M, Wang D BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):292.

PMID: 39849393 PMC: 11758721. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-21198-x.


Patient-centred approaches for the management of unpleasant symptoms in kidney disease.

Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lockwood M, Rhee C, Tantisattamo E, Andreoli S, Balducci A Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022; 18(3):185-198.

PMID: 34980890 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-021-00518-z.


Clinical and dialysis-related characteristics of extremely long-term hemodialysis survivors: Three case reports.

Malgaj Vrecko M, Ponikvar R, Gubensek J, Ponikvar J Hemodial Int. 2021; .

PMID: 33749104 PMC: 8359961. DOI: 10.1111/hdi.12925.

References
1.
Kerr P, Jaw J . Home Hemodialysis: What Is Old Is New Again. Contrib Nephrol. 2017; 190:146-155. DOI: 10.1159/000468961. View

2.
Rivara M, Soohoo M, Streja E, Molnar M, Rhee C, Cheung A . Association of Vascular Access Type with Mortality, Hospitalization, and Transfer to In-Center Hemodialysis in Patients Undergoing Home Hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 11(2):298-307. PMC: 4741041. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.06570615. View

3.
Perl J, Na Y, Tennankore K, Chan C . Temporal Trends and Factors Associated with Home Hemodialysis Technique Survival in Canada. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017; 12(8):1248-1258. PMC: 5544522. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.13271216. View

4.
Moran J, Kraus M . Starting a home hemodialysis program. Semin Dial. 2007; 20(1):35-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00239.x. View

5.
Baillod R . Home dialysis: lessons in patient education. Patient Educ Couns. 1995; 26(1-3):17-24. DOI: 10.1016/0738-3991(95)00721-b. View