» Articles » PMID: 29264632

Social Deprivation Modifies the Association Between Incident Foot Ulceration and Mortality in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: a Longitudinal Study of a Primary-care Cohort

Overview
Journal Diabetologia
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2017 Dec 22
PMID 29264632
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: The aim of this study was to determine whether social deprivation in the presence of diabetes is an independent predictor of developing a foot ulcer and separately of mortality.

Methods: This was a primary-care-based retrospective analysis of 13,955 adults with type 1 (n = 1370) or type 2 (n = 12,585) diabetes after a median follow-up of 10.5 years. Demographic characteristics, indices of social deprivation and clinical variables were assessed at baseline. The primary outcomes were new foot ulceration (in those without a previous history of foot ulcers) and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to describe the associations among foot ulceration, social deprivation and mortality.

Results: The mean age of the population was 69.4 (range: 16-89) years. The incidence of foot ulceration was greater in individuals with type 2 (8.6%) compared with type 1 diabetes (4.8%). Occurrence was similar by sex, but increased with age and deprivation index. Individuals in the highest quintile of deprivation were 77% more likely to develop a foot ulcer compared with those in the lowest quintile (OR 1.77 [95% CI 1.45, 2.14], p < 0.0001). Overall, 2946 (21.1%) deaths were recorded. Compared with individuals without a foot ulcer, the development of a foot ulcer was associated with a higher age- and sex-adjusted mortality rate (25.9% vs 14.0%), and a 72% (HR 1.72 [95% CI 1.56, 1.90], p < 0.001) increased risk of mortality in those with type 2 diabetes. Risk of death increased by 14% per quintile of deprivation in a univariable analysis (HR 1.14 [95% CI 1.10, 1.17]). In multivariable Cox regression analyses, there was a 48% increased risk of mortality in individuals with a foot ulcer (HR 1.48 [95% CI 1.33, 1.66]) independent of the Townsend index score (HR 1.13 [95% CI 1.10, 1.17], per quintile), baseline age, sex, diabetes type, smoking status, hypertension, statin use, β-blocker use, metformin use, HbA levels and insulin use.

Conclusions/interpretation: This study confirms the high mortality rate in individuals with diabetes-related foot ulcers. In addition, socioeconomic disadvantage was found to be an independent effect modifier, contributing to an increased burden of mortality in people with diabetes who develop foot ulceration. In light of this, and as diabetes service configurations are orientated for the next 5-10 years, modelling of foot ulceration risk needs to take socioeconomic disadvantage into account.

Citing Articles

Spatial associations between measures of public transportation and diabetic foot ulcer outcomes in the state of Georgia: 2016-2019.

Vanasse L, Chang H, DSouza R, Ali M, Waller L, Schechter M BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024; 12(6.

PMID: 39719390 PMC: 11683904. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004461.


Unravelling the cardio-renal-metabolic-foot connection in people with diabetes-related foot ulceration: a narrative review.

Lan N, Dwivedi G, Fegan P, Game F, Hamilton E Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024; 23(1):437.

PMID: 39696281 PMC: 11657306. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-024-02527-1.


Prevalence and incidence of peripheral neuropathy, peripheral artery disease, foot disease, and lower extremity amputation in people with diabetes in Ireland; a systematic review protocol.

Kavanagh S, Pallin J, Doherty A, Lazzarini P, OKeeffe L, Buckley C HRB Open Res. 2024; 7:1.

PMID: 39544222 PMC: 11561379. DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13823.2.


Outcomes for Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers Following Transition from Medicaid to Commercial Insurance.

Kwon K, Brown T, Arias Aristizabal J, Armstrong D, Tan T Diabetology (Basel). 2024; 5(3):356-364.

PMID: 39483486 PMC: 11525773. DOI: 10.3390/diabetology5030027.


Equitable Access, Lasting Results: The Influence of Socioeconomic Environment on Bariatric Surgery Outcomes.

Sager La Ganga C, Garcia-Sanz I, Carrillo Lopez E, Navas-Moreno V, Marazuela M, Gancedo-Quintana A Obes Surg. 2024; 35(1):59-66.

PMID: 39466525 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07529-2.


References
1.
Levey A, Bosch J, Lewis J, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D . A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130(6):461-70. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002. View

2.
Ramsey S, Newton K, Blough D, McCulloch D, Sandhu N, Reiber G . Incidence, outcomes, and cost of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999; 22(3):382-7. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.22.3.382. View

3.
Baumer J, Hunt L, Shield J . Social disadvantage, family composition, and diabetes mellitus: prevalence and outcome. Arch Dis Child. 1999; 79(5):427-30. PMC: 1717742. DOI: 10.1136/adc.79.5.427. View

4.
Connolly V, Unwin N, Sherriff P, Bilous R, Kelly W . Diabetes prevalence and socioeconomic status: a population based study showing increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in deprived areas. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000; 54(3):173-7. PMC: 1731634. DOI: 10.1136/jech.54.3.173. View

5.
Pham H, Armstrong D, Harvey C, Harkless L, Giurini J, Veves A . Screening techniques to identify people at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration: a prospective multicenter trial. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23(5):606-11. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.23.5.606. View