» Articles » PMID: 29264183

Current Status of Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Nerve-sparing Radical Cystectomy in Male Patients

Overview
Journal Asian J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2017 Dec 22
PMID 29264183
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During radical cystectomy (RC), the neurovascular bundles are easily removed or damaged, leading to varying rates of incontinence and erectile dysfunction. The nerve-sparing technique was developed to preserve urinary and erectile function. The adoption of laparoscopic and robot-assisted technology has improved visualization and dexterity of pelvic surgeries, thus facilitate the nerve-sparing technique. Although nerve-sparing RC is technically similar with nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, there are still some anatomical differences. There are mainly three different types of nerve-sparing techniques. Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is another important factor to influence erectile function and urinary continence. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) may be an optimal treatment choice in well-selected younger patients with low-volume, organ-confined disease. We should attempt to do, whenever possible, a nerve-sparing cystectomy at least on oneside. However, due to the need of a well-refined surgical technique, nerve-sparing LRC and RARC is now being performed only by experienced urological surgeons.

Citing Articles

Recent advances in oncological endourology.

Chiu A Asian J Urol. 2017; 3(3):113-114.

PMID: 29264176 PMC: 5730829. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2016.05.005.

References
1.
Colombo R, Pellucchi F, Moschini M, Gallina A, Bertini R, Salonia A . Fifteen-year single-centre experience with three different surgical procedures of nerve-sparing cystectomy in selected organ-confined bladder cancer patients. World J Urol. 2015; 33(10):1389-95. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1482-y. View

2.
Parekh D, Messer J, FitzGerald J, Ercole B, Svatek R . Perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2012; 189(2):474-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.077. View

3.
Ong C, Schmitt M, Thalmann G, Studer U . Individualized seminal vesicle sparing cystoprostatectomy combined with ileal orthotopic bladder substitution achieves good functional results. J Urol. 2010; 183(4):1337-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.017. View

4.
Walz J, Epstein J, Ganzer R, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Kaouk J . A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate Related to Optimisation of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: An Update. Eur Urol. 2016; 70(2):301-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.026. View

5.
Pritchett T, Schiff W, Klatt E, Lieskovsky G, SKINNER D . The potency-sparing radical cystectomy: does it compromise the completeness of the cancer resection?. J Urol. 1988; 140(6):1400-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42055-6. View