[Allogeneic Bone Transplantation in Hip Revision Surgery : Indications and Potential for Reconstruction]

Overview

Journal Orthopade

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2017 Dec 21

PMID 29260246

Citations 8

Authors

G A Ahmed

B Ishaque

M Rickert

C Folsch

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The increasing number of people having joint replacements will lead to increasing numbers of revision operations. The transplantation of allogeneic bones might reconstruct bone defects and improve long-term anchorage of the implant. A sufficient primary stability of the implanted construct is necessary to achieve osseous incorporation as well as tight contact between the implanted allogeneic and host bones. Transplantation of bone can contribute to downgrading acetabular defects and so avoid bigger reinforcement implants. An improvement of bone stock due to reconstruction of femoral bony defects might also reduce the size of the stem necessary since the indication might be limited in case of extensive bone defects. According to good longterm results of modular revision stems the Impaction-Bone-Grafting has not yet generally been established.

Citing Articles

Antibacterial Properties of PCL@45s5 Composite Biomaterial Scaffolds Based on Additive Manufacturing.

Zhang C, Ru Y, You J, Lin R, Chen S, Qi Y Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39684126 PMC: 11644186. DOI: 10.3390/polym16233379.

A non-invasive smart scaffold for bone repair and monitoring.

Huang Y, Zhang L, Ji Y, Deng H, Long M, Ge S Bioact Mater. 2022; 19:499-510.

PMID: 35600976 PMC: 9097555. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.04.034.

Impaction bone grafting for segmental acetabular defects: a biomechanical study.

Nele W, Martina F, Stefan R, Frank L, Georg M Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; 143(3):1353-1359.

PMID: 34905066 PMC: 9958163. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04296-y.

Recent advances in the local antibiotics delivery systems for management of osteomyelitis.

Khaled Wassif R, Elkayal M, Shamma R, Elkheshen S Drug Deliv. 2021; 28(1):2392-2414.

PMID: 34755579 PMC: 8583938. DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2021.1998246.

Hydroxyapatite From the Skull of Tuna () Head Combined With Chitosan to Restore Locomotive Function After Spinal Cord Injury.

Ma C, Wang X, Tao N Front Nutr. 2021; 8:734498.

PMID: 34497824 PMC: 8419224. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.734498.

References

Ullmark G, Hovelius L . Impacted morsellized allograft and cement for revision total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary report of 3 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996; 67(1):10-2. DOI: 10.3109/17453679608995600. View

Gruen T, McNeice G, Amstutz H . "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; (141):17-27. View

Leopold S, Rosenberg A, Bhatt R, Sheinkop M, Quigley L, Galante J . Cementless acetabular revision. Evaluation at an average of 10.5 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (369):179-86. View

Wilson M, Hook S, Whitehouse S, Timperley A, Gie G . Femoral impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty: 705 cases from the originating centre. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B(12):1611-1619. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B12.37414. View

Mall N, Nunley R, Smith K, Maloney W, Clohisy J, Barrack R . The fate of grafting acetabular defects during revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(12):3286-94. PMC: 2974866. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1427-0. View

Arumugam G, Nanjayan S, Quah C, Wraighte P, Howard P . Revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous bone and cement: a long-term follow-up study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015; 25(8):1279-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1703-5. View

Albert C, Masri B, Duncan C, Oxland T, Fernlund G . Impaction allografting--the effect of impaction force and alternative compaction methods on the mechanical characteristics of the graft. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008; 87(2):395-405. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31117. View

Maruyama M, Wakabayashi S, Ota H, Tensho K . Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 475(2):387-395. PMC: 5213944. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5107-6. View

Leopold S, Berger R, Rosenberg A, Jacobs J, Quigley L, Galante J . Impaction allografting with cement for revision of the femoral component. A minimum four-year follow-up study with use of a precoated femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81(8):1080-92. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199908000-00004. View

10.

Schmolders J, Friedrich M, Michel R, Randau T, Wimmer M, Strauss A . Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation. Int Orthop. 2014; 39(4):623-30. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2533-5. View

11.

Howie D, Costi K, McGee M, Standen A, Solomon L . Femoral bone is preserved using cemented polished stems in young patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470(11):3024-31. PMC: 3462866. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2327-2. View

12.

Rudert M, Holzapfel B, von Rottkay E, Holzapfel D, Noeth U . Impaction bone grafting for the reconstruction of large bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2015; 27(1):35-46. DOI: 10.1007/s00064-014-0330-3. View

13.

Pilliar R, Lee J, Maniatopoulos C . Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; (208):108-13. View

14.

Board T, Rooney P, Kay P . Strain imparted during impaction grafting may contribute to bony incorporation: an in vitro study of the release of bmp-7 from allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(6):821-4. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B6.20234. View

15.

Friedrich M, Schmolders J, Michel R, Randau T, Wimmer M, Kohlhof H . Management of severe periacetabular bone loss combined with pelvic discontinuity in revision hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2014; 38(12):2455-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2443-6. View

16.

Eldridge J, Smith E, Hubble M, Whitehouse S, Learmonth I . Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty. 1997; 12(5):535-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90176-5. View

17.

Howie D, Callary S, McGee M, Russell N, Solomon L . Reduced femoral component subsidence with improved impaction grafting at revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(12):3314-21. PMC: 2974885. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1484-4. View

18.

Garbuz D, Morsi E, Gross A . Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft. Study with a minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78(5):693-7. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199605000-00008. View

19.

Vanhegan I, Malik A, Jayakumar P, Ul Islam S, Haddad F . A financial analysis of revision hip arthroplasty: the economic burden in relation to the national tariff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(5):619-23. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B5.27073. View

20.

DANTONIO J, McCarthy J, Bargar W, Borden L, Cappelo W, Collis D . Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; (296):133-9. View