» Articles » PMID: 29255364

The Burden of Family Caregiving in the United States: Work Productivity, Health Care Resource Utilization, and Mental Health Among Employed Adults

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Health Services
Date 2017 Dec 20
PMID 29255364
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Family caregiving is an increasingly important component of care for patients and the elderly.

Objective: The aim of this study is to characterize the burden of family caregiving among employed adults.

Methods: Employed adults (≥18 years) from the 2013 US National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS) were classified as family caregivers if they reported currently caring for at least one adult relative. Chi-square tests and one-way analyses of variance assessed whether employed caregivers, weighted to the US population, differed from employed non-caregivers on behavioral characteristics, workplace productivity, and health care resource utilization.

Results: Eight million workers were family caregivers in the United States, more often female than male (51% vs. 49%, < 0.05), and 53% were between 40 and 64 years of age. Eighteen percent of caregivers were Hispanic compared with 15% of non-caregivers ( < 0.05). Similar behavioral characteristics between caregivers and non-caregivers included daily alcohol consumption (6% vs. 5%) and lack of vigorous exercise (25% vs. 29%), but caregivers had a higher prevalence of smoking (26% vs. 19%, < 0.05). Caregivers reported a higher mean percentage of work time missed (8% vs. 4%, < 0.05) and greater productivity impairment (24% vs. 14%, < 0.05). Some form of depression was reported by 53% of caregivers compared with 32% of non-caregivers ( < 0.05), and more caregivers had self-reported insomnia than non-caregivers (46% vs. 37%, < 0.05). The number of self-reported diagnosed comorbidities was higher among caregivers compared with that of non-caregivers (5.0 vs. 3.1, < 0.05), as was the mean number of outpatient visits in the previous 6 months (4.1 vs. 2.7, < 0.05).

Conclusion: Family caregiving is associated with a multidimensional burden that impacts caregivers and has implications for employers and the health care system. Clinicians and employers need to recognize and understand this burden. Characterization of caregivers as reported in this study can inform development of targeted programs to help mitigate the burden.

Citing Articles

Assessing the quality of life of schizophrenia patients and their family caregivers in a Romanian sample: the role of clinical, sociocultural, and demographic factors.

Volker J, Miclutia I Med Pharm Rep. 2025; 98(1):96-110.

PMID: 39949905 PMC: 11817594. DOI: 10.15386/mpr-2816.


Substantial Impact of Later-Life Depression Among Community Older Adults on the Family Caregivers' Burden in the Home Care Setting of Chiang Mai, Northern Thailand.

Shimizu K, Aung M, Moolphate S, Aung T, Koyanagi Y, Supakankunti S Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(1).

PMID: 39859032 PMC: 11766950. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61010050.


Informal Caregiving: Health System Cost Implications.

Shearkhani S, Bai Y, Kuluski K, Anderson G, Wodchis W West J Nurs Res. 2025; 47(3):140-148.

PMID: 39849894 PMC: 11812279. DOI: 10.1177/01939459241310285.


Parkinson's Disease and Caregiving Roles, Demands, and Support Needs and Experiences: A Scoping Review.

Longacre M, Roche L, Kueppers G, Buurman B Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39791686 PMC: 11720262. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13010079.


But at What Cost? Healthcare Utilization of Canadian Carer-Employees.

Ding R, Duxbury L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 21(12.

PMID: 39767525 PMC: 11675624. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21121686.


References
1.
Trivedi R, Beaver K, Bouldin E, Eugenio E, Zeliadt S, Nelson K . Characteristics and well-being of informal caregivers: Results from a nationally-representative US survey. Chronic Illn. 2013; 10(3):167-79. DOI: 10.1177/1742395313506947. View

2.
Kroenke K, Spitzer R, Williams J . The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16(9):606-13. PMC: 1495268. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. View

3.
Chari A, Engberg J, Ray K, Mehrotra A . The opportunity costs of informal elder-care in the United States: new estimates from the American Time Use Survey. Health Serv Res. 2014; 50(3):871-82. PMC: 4450934. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12238. View

4.
Dilworth-Anderson P, Williams I, Gibson B . Issues of race, ethnicity, and culture in caregiving research: a 20-year review (1980-2000). Gerontologist. 2002; 42(2):237-72. DOI: 10.1093/geront/42.2.237. View

5.
Reilly M, Zbrozek A, Dukes E . The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993; 4(5):353-65. DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199304050-00006. View