Cigarette Design Features: Effects on Emission Levels, User Perception, and Behavior

Overview

Journal Tob Regul Sci

Date 2017 Dec 19

PMID 29250577

Citations 14

Authors

Reinskje Talhout

Patricia A Richter

Irina Stepanov

Christina V Watson

Clifford H Watson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: This paper describes the effects of non-tobacco, physical cigarette design features on smoke emissions, product appeal, and smoking behaviors - 3 factors that determine smoker's exposure and related health risks.

Methods: We reviewed available evidence for the impact of filter ventilation, new filter types, and cigarettes dimensions on toxic emissions, smoker's perceptions, and behavior. For evidence sources we used scientific literature and websites providing product characteristics and marketing information.

Results: Whereas filter ventilation results in lower machine-generated emissions, it also leads to perceptions of lighter taste and relative safety in smokers who can unwittingly employ more intense smoking behavior to obtain the desired amount of nicotine and sensory appeal. Filter additives that modify smoke emissions can also modify sensory cues, resulting in changes in smoking behavior. Flavor capsules increase the cigarette's appeal and novelty, and lead to misperceptions of reduced harm. Slim cigarettes have lower yields of some smoke emissions, but smoking behavior can be more intense than with standard cigarettes.

Conclusions: Physical design features significantly impact machine-measured emission yields in cigarette smoke, product appeal, smoking behaviors, and exposures in smokers. The influence of current and emerging design features is important in understanding the effectiveness of regulatory actions to reduce smoking-related harm.

Citing Articles

Beyond self-reports: serum cotinine reveals sex-and age-related differences of smoking on all-cause and disease-specific mortality.

Jiang Q, Junjun L, Wang X, Luo L, He G, Wu X Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1512603.

PMID: 40034165 PMC: 11873280. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1512603.

The Effects of Filter Ventilation and Expanded Tobacco on the Tar, Nicotine and Carbon Monoxide Yields from Cigarettes Sold in Australia.

Winnall W, Haynes A, Klerx W, Bakker-t Hart I, Versluis C, Leijten N Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 22(1).

PMID: 39857503 PMC: 11764558. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22010050.

Smokers Awareness and Risk Perceptions of Filter Ventilation.

Caruso R, Fix B, Ingabire M, Bansal-Travers M, Rees V, Cummings K Tob Regul Sci. 2024; 6(3):213-223.

PMID: 38957357 PMC: 11218909. DOI: 10.18001/trs.6.3.6.

Protecting public health and the environment: towards a general ban on cellulose acetate cigarette filters in the European Union.

Everaert S, Schoeters G, Lardon F, Janssens A, van Larebeke N, Raquez J Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1282655.

PMID: 38026410 PMC: 10644169. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282655.

Smokers' support for the ban on sale of slim cigarettes in six European countries: findings from the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys.

Mechili E, Przewozniak K, Driezen P, N Kyriakos C, Girvalaki C, Mons U Open Res Eur. 2023; 1:52.

PMID: 37645112 PMC: 10446023. DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.13405.4.

References

Hoffmann D, Djordjevic M, Hoffmann I . The changing cigarette. Prev Med. 1997; 26(4):427-34. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0183. View

Griffiths R . Effects of cigarette rod length on puff volume and carbon monoxide delivery in cigarette smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1985; 15(1-2):1-13. DOI: 10.1016/0376-8716(85)90024-9. View

Rees V, Kreslake J, Wayne G, OConnor R, Cummings K, Connolly G . Role of cigarette sensory cues in modifying puffing topography. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012; 124(1-2):1-10. PMC: 3371306. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.01.012. View

Pauly J, Mepani A, Lesses J, Cummings K, Streck R . Cigarettes with defective filters marketed for 40 years: what Philip Morris never told smokers. Tob Control. 2002; 11 Suppl 1:I51-61. PMC: 1766058. DOI: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i51. View

Jarvik M, Popek P, Schneider N, Gritz E . Can cigarette size and nicotine content influence smoking and puffing rates?. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1978; 58(3):303-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF00427395. View

Counts M, Morton M, Laffoon S, Cox R, Lipowicz P . Smoke composition and predicting relationships for international commercial cigarettes smoked with three machine-smoking conditions. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005; 41(3):185-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.12.002. View

Cao X, Muskhelishvili L, Latendresse J, Richter P, Heflich R . Evaluating the Toxicity of Cigarette Whole Smoke Solutions in an Air-Liquid-Interface Human In Vitro Airway Tissue Model. Toxicol Sci. 2017; 156(1):14-24. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw239. View

Mutti S, Hammond D, Borland R, Cummings M, OConnor R, Fong G . Beyond light and mild: cigarette brand descriptors and perceptions of risk in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Addiction. 2011; 106(6):1166-75. PMC: 4419584. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03402.x. View

Kozlowski L, OConnor R . Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents. Tob Control. 2002; 11 Suppl 1:I40-50. PMC: 1766061. DOI: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i40. View

10.

Dittrich D, Fieblekorn R, Bevan M, Rushforth D, Murphy J, Ashley M . Approaches for the design of reduced toxicant emission cigarettes. Springerplus. 2014; 3:374. PMC: 4125608. DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-374. View

11.

Seeman J, Fournier J, Paine 3rd J, Waymack B . The form of nicotine in tobacco. Thermal transfer of nicotine and nicotine acid salts to nicotine in the gas phase. J Agric Food Chem. 1999; 47(12):5133-45. DOI: 10.1021/jf990409b. View

12.

Melikian A, Djordjevic M, Hosey J, Zhang J, Chen S, Zang E . Gender differences relative to smoking behavior and emissions of toxins from mainstream cigarette smoke. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007; 9(3):377-87. DOI: 10.1080/14622200701188836. View

13.

Borland R, Savvas S . Effects of stick design features on perceptions of characteristics of cigarettes. Tob Control. 2012; 22(5):331-7. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050199. View

14.

Benowitz N, Jacob 3rd P, Bernert J, Wilson M, Wang L, Allen F . Carcinogen exposure during short-term switching from regular to "light" cigarettes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005; 14(6):1376-83. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0667. View

15.

Polzin G, Zhang L, Hearn B, Tavakoli A, Vaughan C, Ding Y . Effect of charcoal-containing cigarette filters on gas phase volatile organic compounds in mainstream cigarette smoke. Tob Control. 2008; 17 Suppl 1:i10-6. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2007.022517. View

16.

Li M, Zhu Y, Li L, Wang W, Yin Y, Zhu Q . Molecularly imprinted polymers on a silica surface for the adsorption of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in mainstream cigarette smoke. J Sep Sci. 2015; 38(14):2551-7. DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201500193. View

17.

Brauer L, Behm F, Lane J, Westman E, Perkins C, Rose J . Individual differences in smoking reward from de-nicotinized cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2001; 3(2):101-9. DOI: 10.1080/14622200123249. View

18.

King B, Borland R . What was "light" and "mild" is now "smooth" and "fine": new labelling of Australian cigarettes. Tob Control. 2005; 14(3):214-5. PMC: 1748026. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2005.011692. View

19.

Kozlowski L, Pillitteri J . Beliefs about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes and efforts to change those beliefs: an overview of early efforts and published research. Tob Control. 2001; 10 Suppl 1:i12-6. PMC: 1766049. DOI: 10.1136/tc.10.suppl_1.i12. View

20.

Thrasher J, Abad-Vivero E, Moodie C, OConnor R, Hammond D, Cummings K . Cigarette brands with flavour capsules in the filter: trends in use and brand perceptions among smokers in the USA, Mexico and Australia, 2012-2014. Tob Control. 2015; 25(3):275-83. PMC: 4798911. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052064. View