» Articles » PMID: 29241254

Patient Self-Management of Asthma Using Mobile Health Applications: A Systematic Review of the Functionalities and Effects

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2017 Dec 15
PMID 29241254
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence regarding the effects of mobile health applications (mHealth apps) for self-management outcomes in patients with asthma and to assess the functionalities of effective interventions. Methods We systematically searched Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included English-language studies that evaluated the effects of smartphone or tablet computer apps on self-management outcomes in asthmatic patients. The characteristics of these studies, effects of interventions, and features of mHealth apps were extracted. Results A total of 10 studies met all the inclusion criteria. Outcomes that were assessed in the included studies were categorized into three groups (clinical, patient-reported, and economic). mHealth apps improved asthma control (five studies) and lung function (two studies) from the clinical outcomes. From the patient-reported outcomes, quality of life (three studies) was statistically significantly improved, while there was no significant impact on self-efficacy scores (two studies). Effects on economic outcomes were equivocal, so that the number of visits (in two studies) and admission and hospitalization-relevant outcomes (in one study) statistically significantly improved; and in four other studies, these outcomes did not improve significantly. mHealth apps features were categorized into seven categories (inform, instruct, record, display, guide, remind/alert, and communicate). Eight of the 10 mHealth apps included more than one functionality. Nearly all interventions had the functionality of recording user-entered data and half of them had the functionality of providing educational information and reminders to patients. Conclusion Multifunctional mHealth apps have good potential in the control of asthma and in improving the quality of life in such patients compared with traditional interventions. Further studies are needed to identify the effectiveness of these interventions on outcomes related to medication adherence and costs.

Citing Articles

Exploring the feasibility, acceptability, usability and safety of a digitally supported self-management intervention for uncontrolled asthma: A pre-post pilot study in secondary care.

Zijp A, Versluis A, Joosse L, Kind T, Rouveroy van Nieuwaal T, Wassink-Bergman C Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241292391.

PMID: 39507014 PMC: 11539187. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241292391.


Evaluation of a Primary Care-Integrated Mobile Health Intervention to Monitor between-Visit Asthma Symptoms.

Sulca Flores J, Dalal A, Sousa J, Foer D, Rodriguez J, Plombon S Appl Clin Inform. 2024; 15(4):785-797.

PMID: 39357877 PMC: 11446627. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788978.


Role of digital education through smartphones in improving knowledge among asthma patients: A preliminary study.

Pohan I, Tarigan A, Pandia P, Mutiara E Narra J. 2024; 4(2):e657.

PMID: 39280284 PMC: 11392001. DOI: 10.52225/narra.v4i2.657.


Relevance of individual bronchial symptoms for asthma diagnosis and control in patients with rhinitis: A MASK-air study.

Sousa-Pinto B, Louis G, Vieira R, Czarlewski W, Anto J, Amaral R Clin Transl Allergy. 2024; 14(6):e12358.

PMID: 38804596 PMC: 11304469. DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12358.


Functionality and Usability of mHealth Apps in Patients with Peritoneal Dialysis: A Systematic Review.

Chao S, Pan C, Wang M, Fang Y, Chen S Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38470704 PMC: 10930967. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12050593.


References
1.
Carpenter D, Geryk L, Sage A, Arrindell C, Sleath B . Exploring the theoretical pathways through which asthma app features can promote adolescent self-management. Transl Behav Med. 2016; 6(4):509-518. PMC: 5110493. DOI: 10.1007/s13142-016-0402-z. View

2.
Armijo-Olivo S, Stiles C, Hagen N, Biondo P, Cummings G . Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010; 18(1):12-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x. View

3.
Burbank A, Lewis S, Hewes M, Schellhase D, Rettiganti M, Hall-Barrow J . Mobile-based asthma action plans for adolescents. J Asthma. 2014; 52(6):583-6. PMC: 5292936. DOI: 10.3109/02770903.2014.995307. View

4.
Nabovati E, Vakili-Arki H, Taherzadeh Z, Saberi M, Medlock S, Abu-Hanna A . Information Technology-Based Interventions to Improve Drug-Drug Interaction Outcomes: A Systematic Review on Features and Effects. J Med Syst. 2016; 41(1):12. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-016-0649-4. View

5.
Ryan D, Price D, Musgrave S, Malhotra S, Lee A, Ayansina D . Clinical and cost effectiveness of mobile phone supported self monitoring of asthma: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2012; 344:e1756. PMC: 3311462. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e1756. View