» Articles » PMID: 29236127

[Basic Knowledge on the Efficacy of Hearing Aids Depending on the Type of Hearing Impairment for Ear, Nose & Throat Specialists]

Overview
Journal HNO
Date 2017 Dec 14
PMID 29236127
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For Ear, Nose & Throat specialists, the physiological and psychoacoustical deficits related to hearing impairment and the compensatory capabilities of hearing aids are topics of prime importance. In conductive hearing loss, the foremost deficit is decreased audibility, for which hearing aids can compensate almost entirely through the use of level independent gain. In the instance of sensorineural hearing loss, however, the irreversible loss of outer and inner hair cells causes a distorted sound perception, which is particularly troublesome when trying to understand speech in noisy environments. Unfortunately, this distortion cannot be compensated through the use of hearing aids. Nevertheless, in particular listening environments, its effects can be lessened by reducing background noise levels through the use of directional microphones and, to a lesser extent, digital noise reduction. Noise reduction is in many cases also the main effect to improve speech discrimination in retrocochlear hearing loss.

Citing Articles

Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms : English version.

Dorfler C, Hocke T, Hast A, Hoppe U HNO. 2020; 68(Suppl 2):93-99.

PMID: 32211930 PMC: 7403172. DOI: 10.1007/s00106-020-00843-y.


[Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms].

Dorfler C, Hocke T, Hast A, Hoppe U HNO. 2019; 68(1):40-47.

PMID: 31728573 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-019-00780-5.


[Audiometric test battery for presbycusis].

Steffens T HNO. 2019; 68(3):164-170.

PMID: 31549193 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-019-00746-7.

References
1.
Gnewikow D, Ricketts T, Bratt G, Mutchler L . Real-world benefit from directional microphone hearing aids. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009; 46(5):603-18. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2007.03.0052. View

2.
Johnstone B, Patuzzi R, Yates G . Basilar membrane measurements and the travelling wave. Hear Res. 1986; 22:147-53. DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90090-0. View

3.
Miller R, Schilling J, Franck K, Young E . Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; 101(6):3602-16. DOI: 10.1121/1.418321. View

4.
Moore B . Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007; 363(1493):947-63. PMC: 2606789. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2152. View

5.
Ryan A, Dallos P . Effect of absence of cochlear outer hair cells on behavioural auditory threshold. Nature. 1975; 253(5486):44-6. DOI: 10.1038/253044a0. View