» Articles » PMID: 29225952

Thirty-year Trends in the Prevalence and Severity of Female Genital Mutilation: a Comparison of 22 Countries

Overview
Journal BMJ Glob Health
Specialty Public Health
Date 2017 Dec 12
PMID 29225952
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Female genital mutilation (FGM) harms women's health and well-being and is widely considered a violation of human rights. The United Nations has called for elimination of the practice by 2030.

Methods: We used household survey data to measure trends in the prevalence of FGM in 22 countries. We also examined trends in the severity of the practice by measuring changes in the prevalence of flesh removal, infibulation and symbolic 'nicking' of the genitals. We evaluated the extent to which measurement error may have influenced our estimates by observing the consistency of reports for the same birth cohorts over successive survey waves.

Results: The prevalence of all types of FGM fell in 17 of 22 countries we examined. The vast majority of women who undergo FGM have flesh removed from their genitals, likely corresponding to the partial or total removal of the clitoris and labia. Infibulation is still practised throughout much of sub-Saharan Africa. Its prevalence has declined in most countries, but in Chad, Mali and Sierra Leone the prevalence has increased by 2-8 percentage points over 30 years. Symbolic nicking of the genitals is relatively rare but becoming more common in Burkina Faso, Chad, Guinea and Mali.

Conclusion: FGM is becoming less common over time, but it remains a pervasive practice in some countries: more than half of women in 7 of the 22 countries we examined still experience FGM. The severity of the procedures has not changed substantially over time. Rigorous evaluation of interventions aimed at eliminating or reducing the harms associated with the practice is needed.

Citing Articles

Prevalence of female genital mutilation and associated factors among women and girls in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ayenew A, Mol B, Bradford B, Abeje G Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):26.

PMID: 38217004 PMC: 10785359. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02428-6.


What African immigrant service providers can teach us about the needs of African immigrant survivors of FGM/C.

Akinsulure-Smith A, Min M Health Care Women Int. 2023; 45(4):463-474.

PMID: 37010566 PMC: 11062593. DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2023.2196247.


"You must cut that long and stinking thing": uncovering the lived experiences of uncircumcised pokot women in North-Eastern Uganda.

Kalengo N, Musinguzi L, Twikirize J BMC Womens Health. 2022; 22(1):433.

PMID: 36333698 PMC: 9636792. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-02005-4.


Knowledge, attitudes, and positions of religious leaders towards female genital cutting: A cross-sectional study from the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

Mahmood K, Shabu S, M-Amen K, Saleh A, Ahmed H, Mzori B PLoS One. 2022; 17(11):e0265799.

PMID: 36318575 PMC: 9624424. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265799.


The global prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of national, regional, facility, and school-based studies.

Farouki L, El-Dirani Z, Abdulrahim S, Akl C, Akik C, McCall S PLoS Med. 2022; 19(9):e1004061.

PMID: 36048881 PMC: 9436112. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004061.


References
1.
Berg R, Underland V, Odgaard-Jensen J, Fretheim A, Vist G . Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(11):e006316. PMC: 4244458. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006316. View

2.
Cook R, Dickens B, Fathalla M . Female genital cutting (mutilation/circumcision): ethical and legal dimensions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002; 79(3):281-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00277-1. View

3.
Yoder P, Wang S, Johansen E . Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in 27 African countries and Yemen. Stud Fam Plann. 2013; 44(2):189-204. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2013.00352.x. View

4.
Hassanin I, Shaaban O . Impact of the complete ban on female genital cutting on the attitude of educated women from Upper Egypt toward the practice. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012; 120(3):275-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.10.010. View

5.
Jackson E, Akweongo P, Sakeah E, Hodgson A, Asuru R, Phillips J . Inconsistent reporting of female genital cutting status in northern Ghana: explanatory factors and analytical consequences. Stud Fam Plann. 2003; 34(3):200-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00200.x. View