» Articles » PMID: 29212701

Multicenter Evaluation of the EPlex Respiratory Pathogen Panel for the Detection of Viral and Bacterial Respiratory Tract Pathogens in Nasopharyngeal Swabs

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2017 Dec 8
PMID 29212701
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The performance of the new ePlex Respiratory Pathogen (RP) panel (GenMark Diagnostics) for the simultaneous detection of 19 viruses (influenza A virus; influenza A H1 virus; influenza A 2009 H1 virus; influenza A H3 virus; influenza B virus; adenovirus; coronaviruses [HKU1, OC43, NL63, and 229E]; human rhinovirus/enterovirus; human metapneumovirus; parainfluenza viruses 1, 2, 3, and 4; and respiratory syncytial virus [RSV] [RSV subtype A and RSV subtype B]) and 2 bacteria ( and ) was evaluated. Prospectively and retrospectively collected nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens ( = 2,908) were evaluated by using the ePlex RP panel, with the bioMérieux/BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel (BioFire RP) as the comparator method. Discordance analysis was performed by using target-specific PCRs and bidirectional sequencing. The reproducibility of the assay was evaluated by using reproducibility panels comprised of 6 pathogens. The overall agreement between the ePlex RP and BioFire RP results was >95% for all targets. Positive percent agreement with the BioFire RP result for viruses ranged from 85.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.2% to 88.9%) to 95.1% (95% CI, 89.0% to 97.9%), while negative percent agreement values ranged from 99.5% (95% CI, 99.1% to 99.7%) to 99.8% (95% CI, 99.5% to 99.9%). Additional testing of discordant targets (12%; 349/2,908) confirmed the results of ePlex RP for 38% (131/349) of samples tested. Reproducibility was 100% for all targets tested, with the exception of adenovirus, for which reproducibilities were 91.6% at low virus concentrations and 100% at moderate virus concentrations. The ePlex RP panel offers a new, rapid, and sensitive "sample-to-answer" multiplex panel for the detection of the most common viral and bacterial respiratory pathogens.

Citing Articles

The role of rapid multiplex molecular syndromic panels in the clinical management of infections in critically ill patients: an experts-opinion document.

Candel F, Salavert M, Canton R, Del Pozo J, Galan-Sanchez F, Navarro D Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):440.

PMID: 39736683 PMC: 11687037. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05224-3.


Multicenter Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx and the BioFire Multiplex Panel Tests for the Detection of Respiratory Pathogens.

Gosert R, Koller R, Meyer J, Drager S, Ramette A, Bingisser R J Med Virol. 2024; 96(12):e70129.

PMID: 39711468 PMC: 11664495. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.70129.


Influenza viruses and SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis via sensitive testing methods in clinical application.

Zhang L, Li C, Shao S, Zhang Z, Chen D Heliyon. 2024; 10(18):e36410.

PMID: 39381246 PMC: 11458974. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36410.


Specimen adequacy assay controls in nucleic acid amplification tests do not correlate with nasopharyngeal swab collection method.

Crawford K, Baniecki M, Dushin E, Tierney C, Guan S, Stensland L J Clin Microbiol. 2024; 62(10):e0097524.

PMID: 39283073 PMC: 11481563. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00975-24.


Miniaturization of CRISPR/Cas12-Based DNA Sensor Array by Non-Contact Printing.

Shigemori H, Fujita S, Tamiya E, Nagai H Micromachines (Basel). 2024; 15(1).

PMID: 38258263 PMC: 10818962. DOI: 10.3390/mi15010144.


References
1.
Kline J, Lewis W, Smith E, Tracy L, Moerschel S . Pertussis: a reemerging infection. Am Fam Physician. 2013; 88(8):507-14. View

2.
Pierce V, Hodinka R . Comparison of the GenMark Diagnostics eSensor respiratory viral panel to real-time PCR for detection of respiratory viruses in children. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50(11):3458-65. PMC: 3486226. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01384-12. View

3.
Juretschko S, Mahony J, Buller R, Manji R, Dunbar S, Walker K . Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of the Luminex Aries Flu A/B & RSV Assay for Pediatric and Adult Respiratory Tract Specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2017; 55(8):2431-2438. PMC: 5527421. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00318-17. View

4.
Jerris R, Williams S, MacDonald H, Ingebrigtsen D, Westblade L, Rogers B . Testing implications of varying targets for Bordetella pertussis: comparison of the FilmArray Respiratory Panel and the Focus B. pertussis PCR assay. J Clin Pathol. 2015; 68(5):394-6. PMC: 4413735. DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202833. View

5.
Barlam T, Soria-Saucedo R, Cabral H, Kazis L . Unnecessary Antibiotics for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections: Association With Care Setting and Patient Demographics. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016; 3(1):ofw045. PMC: 4800455. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofw045. View