» Articles » PMID: 29211187

The Epimed Monitor ICU Database®: a Cloud-based National Registry for Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients in Brazil

Overview
Date 2017 Dec 7
PMID 29211187
Citations 59
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To describe the Epimed Monitor Database®, a Brazilian intensive care unit quality improvement database.

Methods: We described the Epimed Monitor® Database, including its structure and core data. We presented aggregated informative data from intensive care unit admissions from 2010 to 2016 using descriptive statistics. We also described the expansion and growth of the database along with the geographical distribution of participating units in Brazil.

Results: The core data from the database includes demographic, administrative and physiological parameters, as well as specific report forms used to gather detailed data regarding the use of intensive care unit resources, infectious episodes, adverse events and checklists for adherence to best clinical practices. As of the end of 2016, 598 adult intensive care units in 318 hospitals totaling 8,160 intensive care unit beds were participating in the database. Most units were located at private hospitals in the southeastern region of the country. The number of yearly admissions rose during this period and included a predominance of medical admissions. The proportion of admissions due to cardiovascular disease declined, while admissions due to sepsis or infections became more common. Illness severity (Simplified Acute Physiology Score - SAPS 3 - 62 points), patient age (mean = 62 years) and hospital mortality (approximately 17%) remained reasonably stable during this time period.

Conclusion: A large private database of critically ill patients is feasible and may provide relevant nationwide epidemiological data for quality improvement and benchmarking purposes among the participating intensive care units. This database is useful not only for administrative reasons but also for the improvement of daily care by facilitating the adoption of best practices and use for clinical research.

Citing Articles

Acute kidney injury in the pandemic years revisited: distinct patterns of staging and recovery in patients with and without COVID-19.

de Faria N, Suassuna J, de Souza C, Freire S, Gomes C J Nephrol. 2025; .

PMID: 40042786 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-024-02180-7.


Clinical impact of healthcare-associated infections in Brazilian ICUs: a multicenter prospective cohort.

Tomazini B, Besen B, Santos R, Nassar Jr A, Veiga T, Campos V Crit Care. 2025; 29(1):4.

PMID: 39754200 PMC: 11699823. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05203-8.


Risk factors for healthcare-associated infections and their relationship with waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in an intensive care unit: a nested case-control study.

Menezes F, Correa T, Bravim B, Tuma P, Junior M, Gouveia E Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024; 22:eAO0939.

PMID: 39699402 PMC: 11634344. DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0939.


Update on the Epimed Monitor Adult ICU Database: 15 years of its use in national registries, quality improvement initiatives and clinical research.

Soares M, Borges L, Bastos L, Zampieri F, Miranda G, Kurtz P Crit Care Sci. 2024; 36:e20240150en.

PMID: 39230140 PMC: 11463981. DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240150-en.


A decade of the ORCHESTRA study: organizational characteristics, patient outcomes, performance and efficiency in critical care.

Soares M, Salluh J, Zampieri F, Bozza F, Kurtz P Crit Care Sci. 2024; 36:e20240118en.

PMID: 39046062 PMC: 11239203. DOI: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240118-en.


References
1.
Sileanu F, Murugan R, Lucko N, Clermont G, Kane-Gill S, Handler S . AKI in low-risk versus high-risk patients in intensive care. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014; 10(2):187-96. PMC: 4317734. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.03200314. View

2.
Cook S, Visscher W, Hobbs C, Williams R . Project IMPACT: results from a pilot validity study of a new observational database. Crit Care Med. 2002; 30(12):2765-70. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200212000-00024. View

3.
Valentin A, Ferdinande P . Recommendations on basic requirements for intensive care units: structural and organizational aspects. Intensive Care Med. 2011; 37(10):1575-87. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-011-2300-7. View

4.
Soares M, Silva U, Homena Jr W, Fernandes G, De Moraes A, Brauer L . Family care, visiting policies, ICU performance, and efficiency in resource use: insights from the ORCHESTRA study. Intensive Care Med. 2016; 43(4):590-591. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4654-3. View

5.
Charlson M, Sax F, MacKenzie C, Fields S, Braham R, DOUGLAS Jr R . Resuscitation: how do we decide? A prospective study of physicians' preferences and the clinical course of hospitalized patients. JAMA. 1986; 255(10):1316-22. DOI: 10.1001/jama.255.10.1316. View