» Articles » PMID: 29208043

Self-sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Rural Young Women of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Overview
Journal BMC Res Notes
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Dec 7
PMID 29208043
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is a major problem in women and it is important to find a suitable and acceptable screening method, especially among young in low-resource areas for future human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine follow-up investigations. The study sought to test the acceptability of self-sampling as well as the suitability of the specimen collecting devices.

Methods: Ninety-eight young women from rural KwaZulu-Natal were enrolled between March and July 2014. Collected genital specimens were transferred to colour indicator cards for HPV detection. Participants answered a questionnaire where they described their experiences with self-sampling. Samples were tested for high-risk HPV using GP5/6+ PCR.

Results: Of the enrolled participants, 91 answered questionnaires and indicated that self-sampling was preferred by 51/91 (56%) women while 40/91 (44%) indicated preference for sampling by a doctor (p = 0.023). The majority, 64% were comfortable using a swab, 22% preferred a brush while 11% were comfortable with both devices. Of the 98 self-sampled specimens 61 were negative for HPV in both specimens while 37 were HPV-positive in either brush or swab. Of the 37, 26 (70%) were HPV-positive in both brush and swab (kappa = 0.743) and 11 (30%) were discordant.

Conclusions: Self-sampling was acceptable to the majority of participants in this rural area. The Dacron swab was the preferred device, and can be used in combination with colour indicator cards for comfortable self-sampling, easy storage and transport of specimens plus detection.

Citing Articles

Mapping the HPV Landscape in South African Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Viral Genotypes, Microbiota, and Immune Signals.

Maswanganye C, Mkhize P, Matume N Viruses. 2025; 16(12.

PMID: 39772200 PMC: 11680443. DOI: 10.3390/v16121893.


Experiences and perspectives regarding human papillomavirus self-sampling in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Dzobo M, Dzinamarira T, Jaya Z, Kgarosi K, Mashamba-Thompson T Heliyon. 2024; 10(12):e32926.

PMID: 39021965 PMC: 11253232. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32926.


Zipime-Weka-Schista study protocol: a longitudinal cohort study and economic evaluation of an integrated home-based approach for genital multipathogen screening in women, including female genital schistosomiasis, human papillomavirus, Trichomonas....

Shanaube K, Ndubani R, Kelly H, Webb E, Mayaud P, Lamberti O BMJ Open. 2024; 14(6):e080395.

PMID: 38858160 PMC: 11168163. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080395.


Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and acceptability of self-sampling devices for human Papillomavirus detection: A systematic review.

Aimagambetova G, Atageldiyeva K, Marat A, Suleimenova A, Issa T, Raman S Prev Med Rep. 2024; 38:102590.

PMID: 38283967 PMC: 10821625. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102590.


Effectiveness of a culturally tailored text messaging program for promoting cervical cancer screening in accra, Ghana: a quasi-experimental trial.

Addo-Lartey A, Bonful H, Sefenu R, Abagre T, Asamoah A, Bandoh D BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):22.

PMID: 38172883 PMC: 10765844. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02867-2.


References
1.
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M . Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2014; 136(5):E359-86. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29210. View

2.
Daley E, Alio A, Anstey E, Chandler R, Dyer K, Helmy H . Examining barriers to cervical cancer screening and treatment in Florida through a socio-ecological lens. J Community Health. 2010; 36(1):121-31. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-010-9289-7. View

3.
Waller J, Bartoszek M, Marlow L, Wardle J . Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: a population-based survey. J Med Screen. 2010; 16(4):199-204. DOI: 10.1258/jms.2009.009073. View

4.
Nene B, Jayant K, Arrossi S, Shastri S, Budukh A, Hingmire S . Determinants of womens participation in cervical cancer screening trial, Maharashtra, India. Bull World Health Organ. 2007; 85(4):264-72. PMC: 2636321. DOI: 10.2471/blt.06.031195. View

5.
Milne E, Bockxmeer F, Robertson L, Brisbane J, Ashton L, Scott R . Buccal DNA collection: comparison of buccal swabs with FTA cards. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15(4):816-9. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0753. View