» Articles » PMID: 29204501

Academic Productivity Among Fellowship Associated Adult Total Joint Reconstruction Surgeons

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2017 Dec 6
PMID 29204501
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Hirsch index (h-index) is a measure that evaluates both research volume and quality-taking into consideration both publications and citations of a single author. No prior work has evaluated academic productivity and contributions to the literature of adult total joint replacement surgeons. This study uses h-index to benchmark the academic impact and identify characteristics associated with productivity of faculty members at joint replacement fellowships.

Methods: Adult reconstruction fellowship programs were obtained via the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons website. Via the San Francisco match and program-specific websites, program characteristics (Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education approval, academic affiliation, region, number of fellows, fellow research requirement), associated faculty members, and faculty-specific characteristics (gender, academic title, formal fellowship training, years in practice) were obtained. H-index and total faculty publications served as primary outcome measures. Multivariable linear regression determined statistical significance.

Results: Sixty-six adult total joint reconstruction fellowship programs were identified: 30% were Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education approved and 73% had an academic affiliation. At these institutions, 375 adult reconstruction surgeons were identified; 98.1% were men and 85.3% had formal arthroplasty fellowship training. Average number of publications per faculty member was 50.1 (standard deviation 76.8; range 0-588); mean h-index was 12.8 (standard deviation 13.8; range 0-67). Number of fellows, faculty academic title, years in practice, and formal fellowship training had a significant ( < .05) positive correlation with both h-index and total publications.

Conclusions: The statistical overview presented in this work can help total joint surgeons quantitatively benchmark their academic performance against that of their peers.

Citing Articles

Subspecialties and Characteristics of Leadership Position in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Daher M, Covarrubias O, Parmar T, Boutros M, Yammine P, Boufadel P Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2025; 13(1):39-46.

PMID: 39886348 PMC: 11776383. DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.80029.3654.


Evaluation of Adult Reconstruction and Arthroplasty Fellowships in the United States Based on Academic Productivity.

Williams N, Guzman A, Dela Rueda T, Francisco R, Shin C, Haratian R Arthroplast Today. 2024; 28:101475.

PMID: 39188564 PMC: 11346176. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101475.


Evaluation of Sports Medicine Fellowships in the United States Based on Academic Productivity.

Mayfield C, Bolia I, Ihn H, Haratian A, Hasan L, Hatch G J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021; 5(10).

PMID: 34609973 PMC: 8500592. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00165.


Scholarly Research Productivity among Otolaryngology Residency Graduates and its Relationship to Future Academic Achievement.

Johnson A, Corcoran A, Ferrell M, Johnson B, Mann S, Villwock J Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2021; 130(11):1276-1284.

PMID: 33759593 PMC: 10191109. DOI: 10.1177/00034894211004368.


Effects of institutional policies and characteristics on research productivity at Vietnam science and technology universities.

Nguyen N, Nguyen T, Dao K Heliyon. 2021; 7(1):e06024.

PMID: 33521364 PMC: 7820924. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06024.


References
1.
Ponce F, Lozano A . Academic impact and rankings of American and Canadian neurosurgical departments as assessed using the h index. J Neurosurg. 2010; 113(3):447-57. DOI: 10.3171/2010.3.JNS1032. View

2.
Zhuge Y, Kaufman J, Simeone D, Chen H, Velazquez O . Is there still a glass ceiling for women in academic surgery?. Ann Surg. 2011; 253(4):637-43. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182111120. View

3.
Svider P, Mady L, Husain Q, Sikora A, Setzen M, Baredes S . Geographic differences in academic promotion practices, fellowship training, and scholarly impact. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013; 34(5):464-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2013.04.003. View

4.
Paik A, Mady L, Villanueva N, Goljo E, Svider P, Ciminello F . Research productivity and gender disparities: a look at academic plastic surgery. J Surg Educ. 2014; 71(4):593-600. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.01.010. View

5.
Sood A, Therattil P, Chung S, Lee E . Impact of Subspecialty Fellowship Training on Research Productivity Among Academic Plastic Surgery Faculty in the United States. Eplasty. 2015; 15:e50. PMC: 4655784. View