» Articles » PMID: 29204321

Ordinary Kriging Vs Inverse Distance Weighting: Spatial Interpolation of the Sessile Community of Madagascar Reef, Gulf of Mexico

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2017 Dec 6
PMID 29204321
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Information about the distribution and abundance of the habitat-forming sessile organisms in marine ecosystems is of great importance for conservation and natural resource managers. Spatial interpolation methodologies can be useful to generate this information from sampling points, especially in circumstances where remote sensing methodologies cannot be applied due to small-scale spatial variability of the natural communities and low light penetration in the water column. Interpolation methods are widely used in environmental sciences; however, published studies using these methodologies in coral reef science are scarce. We compared the accuracy of the two most commonly used interpolation methods in all disciplines, inverse distance weighting (IDW) and ordinary kriging (OK), to predict the distribution and abundance of hard corals, octocorals, macroalgae, sponges and zoantharians and identify hotspots of these habitat-forming organisms using data sampled at three different spatial scales (5, 10 and 20 m) in Madagascar reef, Gulf of Mexico. The deeper sandy environments of the leeward and windward regions of Madagascar reef were dominated by macroalgae and seconded by octocorals. However, the shallow rocky environments of the reef crest had the highest richness of habitat-forming groups of organisms; here, we registered high abundances of octocorals and macroalgae, with sponges, and zoantharians dominating in some patches, creating high levels of habitat heterogeneity. IDW and OK generated similar maps of distribution for all the taxa; however, cross-validation tests showed that IDW outperformed OK in the prediction of their abundances. When the sampling distance was at 20 m, both interpolation techniques performed poorly, but as the sampling was done at shorter distances prediction accuracies increased, especially for IDW. OK had higher mean prediction errors and failed to correctly interpolate the highest abundance values measured , except for macroalgae, whereas IDW had lower mean prediction errors and high correlations between predicted and measured values in all cases when sampling was every 5 m. The accurate spatial interpolations created using IDW allowed us to see the spatial variability of each taxa at a biological and spatial resolution that remote sensing would not have been able to produce. Our study sets the basis for further research projects and conservation management in Madagascar reef and encourages similar studies in the region and other parts of the world where remote sensing technologies are not suitable for use.

Citing Articles

Interpolation of Point Prevalence Rate of the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Subtype H5N8 Second Phase Epidemic in South Korea.

Ahmad S, Koh K, Lee J, Suh G, Lee C Vet Sci. 2022; 9(3).

PMID: 35324867 PMC: 8954420. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9030139.


Spatial benthic community analysis of shallow coral reefs to support coastal management in Culebra Island, Puerto Rico.

Gomez-Andujar N, Hernandez-Delgado E PeerJ. 2020; 8:e10080.

PMID: 33088617 PMC: 7568481. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10080.


Assessment of Ordinary Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighting Methods for Modeling Chromium and Cadmium Soil Pollution in E-Waste Sites in Douala, Cameroon.

Ouabo R, Sangodoyin A, Ogundiran M J Health Pollut. 2020; 10(26):200605.

PMID: 32509406 PMC: 7269327. DOI: 10.5696/2156-9614-10.26.200605.

References
1.
Arias-Gonzalez J, Fung T, Seymour R, Garza-Perez J, Acosta-Gonzalez G, Bozec Y . A coral-algal phase shift in Mesoamerica not driven by changes in herbivorous fish abundance. PLoS One. 2017; 12(4):e0174855. PMC: 5405933. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174855. View

2.
Gong G, Mattevada S, OBryant S . Comparison of the accuracy of kriging and IDW interpolations in estimating groundwater arsenic concentrations in Texas. Environ Res. 2014; 130:59-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2013.12.005. View

3.
Newman M, Paredes G, Sala E, Jackson J . Structure of Caribbean coral reef communities across a large gradient of fish biomass. Ecol Lett. 2006; 9(11):1216-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00976.x. View

4.
Gross M . Hopes and fears for future of coral reefs. Curr Biol. 2013; 23(15):R635-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.062. View

5.
Duprey N, Yasuhara M, Baker D . Reefs of tomorrow: eutrophication reduces coral biodiversity in an urbanized seascape. Glob Chang Biol. 2016; 22(11):3550-3565. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13432. View