» Articles » PMID: 29203681

Patients' Views on Interactions with Practitioners for Type 2 Diabetes: a Longitudinal Qualitative Study in Primary Care over 10 Years

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2017 Dec 6
PMID 29203681
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It has been suggested that interactions between patients and practitioners in primary care have the potential to delay progression of complications in type 2 diabetes. However, as primary care faces greater pressures, patient experiences of patient-practitioner interactions might be changing.

Aim: To explore the views of patients with type 2 diabetes on factors that are of significance to them in patient-practitioner interactions in primary care after diagnosis, and over the last 10 years of living with the disease.

Design And Setting: A longitudinal qualitative analysis over 10 years in UK primary care.

Method: The study was part of a qualitative and quantitative examination of patient experience within the existing ADDITION-Cambridge and ADDITION-Plus trials from 2002 to 2016. The researchers conducted a qualitative descriptive analysis of free-text comments to an open-ended question within the CARE measure questionnaire at 1 and 10 years after diagnosis with diabetes. Data were analysed cross-sectionally at each time point, and at an individual level moving both backwards and forwards between time points to describe emergent topics.

Results: At the 1-year follow-up, 311 out of 1106 (28%) participants had commented; 101 out of 380 (27%) participants commented at 10-year follow-up; and 46 participants commented at both times. Comments on preferences for face-to-face contact, more time with practitioners, and relational continuity of care were more common over time.

Conclusion: This study highlights issues related to the wider context of interactions between patients and practitioners in the healthcare system over the last 10 years since diagnosis. Paradoxically, these same aspects of care that are valued over time from diagnosis are also increasingly unprotected in UK primary care.

Citing Articles

Measuring treatment burden in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM): a mixed-methods systematic review.

Lin K, Yao M, Ji X, Li R, Andrew L, Oosthuizen J BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):206.

PMID: 38858619 PMC: 11165743. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02461-x.


Understanding Gaps in the Hypertension and Diabetes Care Cascade: Systematic Scoping Review.

Wang J, Tan F, Wang Z, Yu Y, Yang J, Wang Y JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023; 10:e51802.

PMID: 38149840 PMC: 10907944. DOI: 10.2196/51802.


Patient involvement in the encounter between general practice and patients with a chronic disease. Results of a scoping review focusing on type 2 diabetes and obstructive pulmonary disease.

Titlestad S, Marcussen M, Rasmussen M, Norgaard B Eur J Gen Pract. 2022; 28(1):260-269.

PMID: 36503359 PMC: 9754033. DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2022.2153827.


Data Mining of Free-Text Responses: An Innovative Approach to Analyzing Patient Perspectives on Treatment for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps in a Phase IIa Proof-of-Concept Study for Dupilumab.

Khan A, Abbe A, Falissard B, Carita P, Bachert C, Mullol J Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021; 15:2577-2586.

PMID: 34848949 PMC: 8611726. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S320242.


"I still feel so lost": experiences of women receiving SANE care during the year after sexual assault.

Buchbinder M, Brassfield E, Tungate A, Witkemper K, Danza T, Lechner M J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021; 2(4):e12464.

PMID: 34263245 PMC: 8254598. DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12464.


References
1.
Derksen F, Bensing J, Lagro-Janssen A . Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2013; 63(606):e76-84. PMC: 3529296. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X660814. View

2.
Hobbs F, Bankhead C, Mukhtar T, Stevens S, Perera-Salazar R, Holt T . Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007-14. Lancet. 2016; 387(10035):2323-2330. PMC: 4899422. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00620-6. View

3.
Gulliford M, Naithani S, Morgan M . Measuring continuity of care in diabetes mellitus: an experience-based measure. Ann Fam Med. 2006; 4(6):548-55. PMC: 1687166. DOI: 10.1370/afm.578. View

4.
Lawton J, Parry O, Peel E, Douglas M . Diabetes service provision: a qualitative study of newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes patients' experiences and views. Diabet Med. 2005; 22(9):1246-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01619.x. View

5.
Burridge L, Foster M, Donald M, Zhang J, Russell A, Jackson C . A qualitative follow-up study of diabetes patients' appraisal of an integrated diabetes service in primary care. Health Soc Care Community. 2016; 25(3):1031-1040. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12402. View