Microbiota and Environmental Stress: How Pollution Affects Microbial Communities in Manila Clams
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Given the crucial role of microbiota in host development, health, and environmental interactions, genomic analyses focusing on host-microbiota interactions should certainly be considered in the investigation of the adaptive mechanisms to environmental stress. Recently, several studies suggested that microbiota associated to digestive tract is a key, although still not fully understood, player that must be considered to assess the toxicity of environmental contaminants. Bacteria-dependent metabolism of xenobiotics may indeed modulate the host toxicity. Conversely, environmental variables (including pollution) may alter the microbial community and/or its metabolic activity leading to host physiological alterations that may contribute to their toxicity. Here, 16s rRNA gene amplicon sequencing has been applied to characterize the hepatopancreas microbiota composition of the Manila clam, Ruditapes philippinarum. The animals were collected in the Venice lagoon area, which is subject to different anthropogenic pressures, mainly represented by the industrial activities of Porto Marghera (PM). Seasonal and geographic differences in clam microbiotas were explored and linked to host response to chemical stress identified in a previous study at the transcriptome level, establishing potential interactions among hosts, microbes, and environmental parameters. The obtained results showed the recurrent presence of putatively detoxifying bacterial taxa in PM clams during winter and over-representation of several metabolic pathways involved in xenobiotic degradation, which suggested the potential for host-microbial synergistic detoxifying actions. Strong interaction between seasonal and chemically-induced responses was also observed, which partially obscured such potentially synergistic actions. Seasonal variables and exposure to toxicants were therefore shown to interact and substantially affect clam microbiota, which appeared to mirror host response to environmental variation. It is clear that understanding how animals respond to chemical stress cannot ignore a key component of such response, the microbiota.
Efficiency comparison of DNA extraction kits for analysing the cockle gut bacteriome.
Lourenco C, Almeida A, Soares A, Marques C Heliyon. 2024; 10(20):e38846.
PMID: 39640665 PMC: 11620152. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38846.
Chung S, Cheung K, Arromrak B, Li Z, Tse C, Gaitan-Espitia J Environ Microbiome. 2024; 19(1):74.
PMID: 39397007 PMC: 11479550. DOI: 10.1186/s40793-024-00620-2.
The early life exposome and autism risk: a role for the maternal microbiome?.
Di Gesu C, Buffington S Gut Microbes. 2024; 16(1):2385117.
PMID: 39120056 PMC: 11318715. DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2385117.
Chen L, Li D, Shen Y, Li Z, Hao H, Ke C Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1366305.
PMID: 38680921 PMC: 11047130. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1366305.
The Profound Influence of Gut Microbiome and Extracellular Vesicles on Animal Health and Disease.
Barathan M, Ng S, Lokanathan Y, Ng M, Law J Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(7).
PMID: 38612834 PMC: 11012031. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25074024.