» Articles » PMID: 29201021

PifC and Osa, Plasmid Weapons Against Rival Conjugative Coupling Proteins

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2017 Dec 5
PMID 29201021
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bacteria display a variety of mechanisms to control plasmid conjugation. Among them, fertility inhibition (FI) systems prevent conjugation of co-resident plasmids within donor cells. Analysis of the mechanisms of inhibition between conjugative plasmids could provide new alternatives to fight antibiotic resistance dissemination. In this work, inhibition of conjugation of broad host range IncW plasmids was analyzed in the presence of a set of co-resident plasmids. Strong FI systems against plasmid R388 conjugation were found in IncF/MOB as well as in IncI/MOB plasmids, represented by plasmids F and R64, respectively. In both cases, the responsible gene was , known also to be involved in FI of IncP plasmids and T-DNA transfer to plant cells. It was also discovered that the R388 gene , which affects T-DNA transfer, also prevented conjugation of IncP-1/MOB plasmids represented by plasmids RP4 and R751. Conjugation experiments of different mobilizable plasmids, helped by either FI-susceptible or FI-resistant transfer systems, demonstrated that the conjugative component affected by both PifC and Osa was the type IV conjugative coupling protein. In addition, analysis of FI proteins suggests that they represent recent acquisitions of conjugative plasmids, i.e., are not shared by members of the same plasmid species. This implies that FI are rapidly-moving accessory genes, possibly acting on evolutionary fights between plasmids for the colonization of specific hosts.

Citing Articles

Encounter rates and engagement times limit the transmission of conjugative plasmids.

Rodriguez-Grande J, Ortiz Y, Garcia-Lopez D, Garcillan-Barcia M, de la Cruz F, Fernandez-Lopez R PLoS Genet. 2025; 21(2):e1011560.

PMID: 39919124 PMC: 11828410. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011560.


Conjugation's Toolkit: the Roles of Nonstructural Proteins in Bacterial Sex.

Cooke M, Herman C J Bacteriol. 2023; 205(3):e0043822.

PMID: 36847532 PMC: 10029717. DOI: 10.1128/jb.00438-22.


Targeted bacterial conjugation mediated by synthetic cell-to-cell adhesions.

Robledo M, Alvarez B, Cuevas A, Gonzalez S, Ruano-Gallego D, Fernandez L Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50(22):12938-12950.

PMID: 36511856 PMC: 9825185. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac1164.


Towards a better understanding of antimicrobial resistance dissemination: what can be learnt from studying model conjugative plasmids?.

Shen Z, Tang C, Liu G Mil Med Res. 2022; 9(1):3.

PMID: 35012680 PMC: 8744291. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-021-00362-z.


Plasmid co-infection: linking biological mechanisms to ecological and evolutionary dynamics.

Igler C, Huisman J, Siedentop B, Bonhoeffer S, Lehtinen S Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021; 377(1842):20200478.

PMID: 34839701 PMC: 8628072. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0478.


References
1.
Waters V . Conjugative transfer in the dissemination of beta-lactam and aminoglycoside resistance. Front Biosci. 1999; 4:D433-56. DOI: 10.2741/waters. View

2.
Gasson M, Willetts N . Five control systems preventing transfer of Escherichia coli K-12 sex factor F. J Bacteriol. 1975; 122(2):518-25. PMC: 246086. DOI: 10.1128/jb.122.2.518-525.1975. View

3.
Olsen R, Shipley P . RP1 properties and fertility inhibition among P, N, W, and X incompatibility group plasmids. J Bacteriol. 1975; 123(1):28-35. PMC: 235687. DOI: 10.1128/jb.123.1.28-35.1975. View

4.
Wilkins B . Plasmid promiscuity: meeting the challenge of DNA immigration control. Environ Microbiol. 2002; 4(9):495-500. DOI: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00332.x. View

5.
Sorensen A, Hansen L, Johannesen E, Sorensen S . Conjugative plasmid conferring resistance to olaquindox. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003; 47(2):798-9. PMC: 151768. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.798-799.2003. View