» Articles » PMID: 29201014

Impaired Interoceptive Accuracy in Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Dec 5
PMID 29201014
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Interoception (the perception of internal bodily sensations) is strongly linked to emotional experience and sensitivity to the emotions of others in healthy subjects. Interoceptive impairment may contribute to the profound socioemotional symptoms that characterize frontotemporal dementia (FTD) syndromes, but remains poorly defined.

Methods: Patients representing all major FTD syndromes and healthy age-matched controls performed a heartbeat counting task as a measure of interoceptive accuracy. In addition, patients had volumetric MRI for voxel-based morphometric analysis, and their caregivers completed a questionnaire assessing patients' daily-life sensitivity to the emotions of others.

Results: Interoceptive accuracy was impaired in patients with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia relative to healthy age-matched individuals, but not in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia. Impaired interoceptive accuracy correlated with reduced daily-life emotional sensitivity across the patient cohort, and with atrophy of right insula, cingulate, and amygdala on voxel-based morphometry in the impaired semantic variant group, delineating a network previously shown to support interoceptive processing in the healthy brain.

Conclusion: Interoception is a promising novel paradigm for defining mechanisms of reduced emotional reactivity, empathy, and self-awareness in neurodegenerative syndromes and may yield objective measures for these complex symptoms.

Citing Articles

Clinical recognition of frontotemporal dementia with right anterior temporal predominance: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Ulugut H, Bertoux M, Younes K, Montembeault M, Fumagalli G, Samanci B Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 20(8):5647-5661.

PMID: 38982845 PMC: 11350044. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14076.


Cortical and subcortical mapping of the allostatic-interoceptive system in the human brain using 7 Tesla fMRI.

Zhang J, Chen D, Deming P, Srirangarajan T, Theriault J, Kragel P bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37546889 PMC: 10401932. DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.20.548178.


Autonomic nervous system flexibility for understanding brain aging.

Lin F, Heffner K Ageing Res Rev. 2023; 90:102016.

PMID: 37459967 PMC: 10530154. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102016.


Thinking versus feeling: How interoception and cognition influence emotion recognition in behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease.

Hazelton J, Fittipaldi S, Fraile-Vazquez M, Sourty M, Legaz A, Hudson A Cortex. 2023; 163:66-79.

PMID: 37075507 PMC: 11177281. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.02.009.


The architecture of abnormal reward behaviour in dementia: multimodal hedonic phenotypes and brain substrate.

Chokesuwattanaskul A, Jiang H, Bond R, Jimenez D, Russell L, Sivasathiaseelan H Brain Commun. 2023; 5(2):fcad027.

PMID: 36942157 PMC: 10023829. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad027.


References
1.
Balconi M, Cotelli M, Brambilla M, Manenti R, Cosseddu M, Premi E . Understanding Emotions in Frontotemporal Dementia: The Explicit and Implicit Emotional Cue Mismatch. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015; 46(1):211-25. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-142826. View

2.
Tsakiris M, Tajadura-Jimenez A, Costantini M . Just a heartbeat away from one's body: interoceptive sensitivity predicts malleability of body-representations. Proc Biol Sci. 2011; 278(1717):2470-6. PMC: 3125630. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2547. View

3.
Rosen H, Gorno-Tempini M, GOLDMAN W, Perry R, Schuff N, Weiner M . Patterns of brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. Neurology. 2002; 58(2):198-208. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.58.2.198. View

4.
Ondobaka S, Kilner J, Friston K . The role of interoceptive inference in theory of mind. Brain Cogn. 2015; 112:64-68. PMC: 5312780. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.08.002. View

5.
Garfinkel S, Critchley H . Threat and the Body: How the Heart Supports Fear Processing. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015; 20(1):34-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.005. View