» Articles » PMID: 29196764

Differences in Trabecular Microarchitecture and Simplified Boundary Conditions Limit the Accuracy of Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite Element Models of Vertebral Failure

Overview
Journal J Biomech Eng
Date 2017 Dec 3
PMID 29196764
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Vertebral fractures are common in the elderly, but efforts to reduce their incidence have been hampered by incomplete understanding of the failure processes that are involved. This study's goal was to elucidate failure processes in the lumbar vertebra and to assess the accuracy of quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element (FE) simulations of these processes. Following QCT scanning, spine segments (n = 27) consisting of L1 with adjacent intervertebral disks and neighboring endplates of T12 and L2 were compressed axially in a stepwise manner. A microcomputed tomography scan was performed at each loading step. The resulting time-lapse series of images was analyzed using digital volume correlation (DVC) to quantify deformations throughout the vertebral body. While some diversity among vertebrae was observed on how these deformations progressed, common features were large strains that developed progressively in the superior third and, concomitantly, in the midtransverse plane, in a manner that was associated with spatial variations in microstructural parameters such as connectivity density. Results of FE simulations corresponded qualitatively to the measured failure patterns when boundary conditions were derived from DVC displacements at the endplate. However, quantitative correspondence was often poor, particularly when boundary conditions were simplified to uniform compressive loading. These findings suggest that variations in trabecular microstructure are one cause of the differences in failure patterns among vertebrae and that both the lack of incorporation of these variations into QCT-based FE models and the oversimplification of boundary conditions limit the accuracy of these models in simulating vertebral failure.

Citing Articles

The Relationship Between the Heterogeneity of Lumbar Vertebral Trabecular Bone Mineral Density Distribution and Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.

Wang Y, Ma D, Wang C, Zhang X, Tang M, Hu J Calcif Tissue Int. 2025; 116(1):49.

PMID: 40067443 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-025-01342-4.


Disc degeneration influences the strain magnitude and stress distribution within the adjacent trabecular bone.

Raftery K, Kargarzadeh A, Tavana S, Newell N Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 12:1511685.

PMID: 39741500 PMC: 11685154. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1511685.


Experimentally Validated Finite Element Analysis of Thoracic Spine Compression Fractures in a Porcine Model.

Guitteny S, Lee C, Amirouche F Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(1).

PMID: 38247973 PMC: 10813756. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11010096.


Geometric determinants of the mechanical behavior of image-based finite element models of the intervertebral disc.

Fleps I, Newman H, Elliott D, Morgan E J Orthop Res. 2024; 42(6):1343-1355.

PMID: 38245852 PMC: 11055679. DOI: 10.1002/jor.25788.


Digital volume correlation for the characterization of musculoskeletal tissues: Current challenges and future developments.

DallAra E, Tozzi G Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:1010056.

PMID: 36267445 PMC: 9577231. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1010056.


References
1.
Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon D, Wong J, King A, Tosteson A . Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2006; 22(3):465-75. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.061113. View

2.
Imai K, Ohnishi I, Bessho M, Nakamura K . Nonlinear finite element model predicts vertebral bone strength and fracture site. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(16):1789-94. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000225993.57349.df. View

3.
Crawford R, Cann C, Keaveny T . Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. Bone. 2003; 33(4):744-50. DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(03)00210-2. View

4.
Hosseini H, Clouthier A, Zysset P . Experimental validation of finite element analysis of human vertebral collapse under large compressive strains. J Biomech Eng. 2014; 136(4). DOI: 10.1115/1.4026409. View

5.
Mosekilde L, Bentzen S, Ortoft G, Jorgensen J . The predictive value of quantitative computed tomography for vertebral body compressive strength and ash density. Bone. 1989; 10(6):465-70. DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(89)90080-x. View