» Articles » PMID: 29195898

Outcomes of Displaced Olecranon Fractures Treated with the Olecranon Sled

Overview
Date 2017 Dec 3
PMID 29195898
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Tension-band wiring is largely considered the gold standard for fixation of displaced olecranon fractures despite high rates of hardware complications. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of displaced olecranon fractures treated with the Olecranon Sled.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all displaced olecranon fractures from 2011-2015 treated with the Olecranon Sled. Inclusion was limited to functionally independent patients with Mayo type II fractures and minimum 12-month follow-up. We assessed clinical outcomes including range of motion; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; and Mayo Elbow Performance Score.

Results: Twenty-two patients with a mean follow-up period of 31.8 months (range, 12-71 months) were included in the study. All patients indicated satisfactory outcomes. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 95.5 (range, 70-100), and the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 3.1 (range, 0-18.3). The mean total arc of elbow flexion was 145° (range, 134°-158°), and the mean total arc of forearm rotation was 175° (range, 160°-180°). There were no hardware-related complications. The overall complication rate was 4.5% (1 of 22) as significant heterotopic ossification developed in 1 patient, requiring contracture release.

Conclusion: The Olecranon Sled is a reliable and well-tolerated implant for the treatment of olecranon fractures. This device results in excellent functional outcomes and may obviate hardware removal.

Citing Articles

Clinical outcomes of olecranon sled fixation in patients with Mayo type II olecranon fractures.

Chen C, Zhang J, Cao R, Hua K, Zha Y, Gong M Heliyon. 2024; 10(8):e29184.

PMID: 38628716 PMC: 11019171. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29184.


Predicting secondary surgery after operative fixation of olecranon fractures: a model using data from 800 patients.

Midtgaard K, Frihagen F, Dornan G, Coucheron M, Fossaen C, Grundel D JSES Int. 2021; 5(5):948-953.

PMID: 34505111 PMC: 8411052. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.04.014.


Comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation in Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures.

Caglar C, Akcaalan S, Ozaslan H, Yagar H, Ugurlu M Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2021; 32(1):85-92.

PMID: 33463422 PMC: 8073451. DOI: 10.5606/ehc.2021.75812.


Comparison of all suture fixation with tension band wiring and plate fixation of the olecranon.

Phadnis J, Vaughan A, Luokkala T, Peters J, Watson J, Watts A Shoulder Elbow. 2020; 12(6):414-421.

PMID: 33281946 PMC: 7689611. DOI: 10.1177/1758573219831662.


Biomechanical Comparison of Olecranon Sled Versus Intramedullary Screw Tension Banding for Olecranon Osteotomies.

Kia C, Dukas A, Marshall S, Voss A, Obopilwe E, Browner B Orthop J Sports Med. 2018; 6(12):2325967118816075.

PMID: 30574518 PMC: 6299312. DOI: 10.1177/2325967118816075.