» Articles » PMID: 29187736

Rules for Processing Genetic Data for Research Purposes in View of the New EU General Data Protection Regulation

Overview
Journal Eur J Hum Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2017 Dec 1
PMID 29187736
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genetic data contain sensitive health and non-health-related information about the individuals and their family members. Therefore, adopting adequate privacy safeguards is paramount when processing genetic data for research or clinical purposes. One of the major legal instruments for personal data protection in the EU is the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which has entered into force in May 2016 and repealed the Directive 95/46/EC, with an ultimate goal of enhancing effectiveness and harmonization of personal data protection in the EU. This paper explores the major provisions of the new Regulation with regard to processing genetic data, and assesses the influence of such provisions on reinforcing the legal safeguards when sharing genetic data for research purposes. The new Regulation attempts to elucidate the scope of personal data, by recognizing pseudonymized data as personal (identifiable) data, and including genetic data in the catalog of special categories of data (sensitive data). Moreover, a set of new rules is laid out in the Regulation for processing personal data under the scientific research exemption. For instance, further use of genetic data for scientific research purposes, without obtaining additional consent will be allowed, if the specific conditions is met. The new Regulation has already fueled concerns among various stakeholders, owing to the challenges that may emerge when implementing the Regulation across the countries. Notably, the provided definition for pseudonymized data has been criticized because it leaves too much room for interpretations, and it might undermine the harmonization of the data protection across the countries.

Citing Articles

Understanding Genetic Screening: Harnessing Health Information to Prevent Disease Risks.

Lee C, Chuang C, Chiu H, Chang Y, Tu Y, Lo Y Int J Med Sci. 2025; 22(4):903-919.

PMID: 39991772 PMC: 11843151. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.101219.


AI and ML-based risk assessment of chemicals: predicting carcinogenic risk from chemical-induced genomic instability.

Singh A, Bhardwaj P, Laux P, Pradeep P, Busse M, Luch A Front Toxicol. 2024; 6:1461587.

PMID: 39659701 PMC: 11628524. DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1461587.


Experience or perception: What healthcare providers need when using the Utrecht Symptom Diary-4 Dimensional, a mixed-methods study.

Lormans T, de Graaf E, Leget C, Teunissen S Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024; 18:26323524241281748.

PMID: 39493319 PMC: 11528593. DOI: 10.1177/26323524241281748.


Mendelian Randomization Studies in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases.

Ko D, Kim Y J Lipid Atheroscler. 2024; 13(3):280-291.

PMID: 39355404 PMC: 11439750. DOI: 10.12997/jla.2024.13.3.280.


Attention to the Values, Wishes and Needs of Patients With Advanced Cancer by Hospital Clinicians, an Exploratory Qualitative Study.

de Vries S, Pijnappel L, Vervoort S, van der Linden Y, Teunissen S, de Graaf E Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024; 42(3):300-308.

PMID: 39229838 PMC: 11792391. DOI: 10.1177/10499091241261025.


References
1.
Shabani M, Knoppers B, Borry P . From the principles of genomic data sharing to the practices of data access committees. EMBO Mol Med. 2015; 7(5):507-9. PMC: 4492813. DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201405002. View

2.
Beyleveld D, Townend D . When is personal data rendered anonymous? Interpreting Recital 26 of Directive 95/46/EC. Med Law Int. 2006; 6(2):73-86. DOI: 10.1177/096853320400600201. View

3.
Phillips M, Knoppers B . The discombobulation of de-identification. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34(11):1102-1103. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3696. View

4.
Chassang G . The impact of the EU general data protection regulation on scientific research. Ecancermedicalscience. 2017; 11:709. PMC: 5243137. DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.709. View

5.
de Paor A . Regulating genetic information--exploring the options in legal theory. Eur J Health Law. 2014; 21(5):425-53. DOI: 10.1163/15718093-12341335. View