Identification of Indirect Effects in a Cognitive Patient Education (COPE) Intervention for Low Back Pain

Overview

Journal Phys Ther

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2017 Nov 30

PMID 29186635

Citations 10

Authors

Gemma Mansell

Kjersti Storheim

Ida Lochting

Erik L Werner

Margreth Grotle

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Many interventions for the treatment of low back pain exist, but the mechanisms through which such treatments work are not always clear. This situation is especially true for biopsychosocial interventions that incorporate several different components and methods of delivery.

Objective: The study objective was to examine the indirect effects of the Cognitive Patient Education (COPE) intervention via illness perceptions, back pain myths, and pain catastrophizing on disability outcome.

Design: This study was a secondary analysis of the COPE randomized controlled trial.

Methods: Mediation analysis techniques were employed to examine the indirect effects of the COPE intervention via residualized change (baseline - posttreatment) in the 3 variables hypothesized to be targeted by the COPE intervention on posttreatment disability outcome. Pain intensity at baseline, pain duration, clinician type, and a treatment-mediator interaction term were controlled for in the analysis.

Results: Preliminary analyses confirmed that changes in pain catastrophizing and illness perceptions (not back pain myths) were related to both allocation to the intervention arm and posttreatment disability score. The treatment exerted statistically significant indirect effects via changes in illness perceptions and pain catastrophizing on posttreatment disability score (illness perceptions standardized indirect effect = 0.09 [95% CI = 0.03 to 0.16]; pain catastrophizing standardized indirect effect = 0.05 [95% CI = 0.01 to 0.12]). However, the inclusion of an interaction term led to the indirect effects being significantly reduced, with the effects no longer being statistically significant.

Limitations: This study presents a secondary analysis of variables not identified a priori as being potentially important treatment targets; other, unmeasured factors could also be important in explaining treatment effects.

Conclusions: The finding that small indirect effects of the COPE intervention via changes in illness perceptions and pain catastrophizing on posttreatment disability could be estimated indicates that these variables may be viable treatment targets for biopsychosocial interventions; however, this finding must be viewed in light of the adjusted analyses, which showed that the indirect effects were significantly reduced through the inclusion of a treatment-mediator interaction term.

Citing Articles

Illness perceptions in people with chronic and disabling non-specific neck pain seeking primary healthcare: a qualitative study.

Kragting M, Pool-Goudzwaard A, Coppieters M, OSullivan P, Voogt L BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):179.

PMID: 38413876 PMC: 10900625. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07302-7.

Effects and Mechanisms of a Web- and Mobile-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Intervention for Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in Nurses: Fully Decentralized Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lu Y, Li Y, Huang Y, Zhang X, Wang J, Wu L J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e51549.

PMID: 38010787 PMC: 10714267. DOI: 10.2196/51549.

The Effectiveness of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention Integrated with Physical Therapy (MIND-PT) for Postsurgical Rehabilitation After Lumbar Surgery: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial as Part of the Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) Research....

Fritz J, Rhon D, Garland E, Hanley A, Greenlee T, Fino N Pain Med. 2022; 24(Suppl 1):S115-S125.

PMID: 36069630 PMC: 10403309. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnac138.

From protection to non-protection: A mixed methods study investigating movement, posture and recovery from disabling low back pain.

Wernli K, Smith A, Coll F, Campbell A, Kent P, OSullivan P Eur J Pain. 2022; 26(10):2097-2119.

PMID: 35959703 PMC: 9826080. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2022.

How do psychologically based interventions for chronic musculoskeletal pain work? A systematic review and meta-analysis of specific moderators and mediators of treatment.

Murillo C, Vo T, Vansteelandt S, Harrison L, Cagnie B, Coppieters I Clin Psychol Rev. 2022; 94:102160.

PMID: 35561510 PMC: 11146991. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102160.

References

Emsley R, Dunn G, White I . Mediation and moderation of treatment effects in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. Stat Methods Med Res. 2009; 19(3):237-70. DOI: 10.1177/0962280209105014. View

Moseley G, Nicholas M, Hodges P . A randomized controlled trial of intensive neurophysiology education in chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2004; 20(5):324-30. DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200409000-00007. View

Kraemer H, Wilson G, Fairburn C, Agras W . Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002; 59(10):877-83. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.10.877. View

Broadbent E, Petrie K, Main J, Weinman J . The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006; 60(6):631-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020. View

Mansell G, Kamper S, Kent P . Why and how back pain interventions work: what can we do to find out?. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013; 27(5):685-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2013.10.001. View

Roland M, Morris R . A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983; 8(2):141-4. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004. View

L Werner E, Storheim K, Lochting I, Wisloff T, Grotle M . Cognitive Patient Education for Low Back Pain in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41(6):455-62. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001268. View

Maric M, Wiers R, Prins P . Ten ways to improve the use of statistical mediation analysis in the practice of child and adolescent treatment research. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2012; 15(3):177-91. PMC: 3416975. DOI: 10.1007/s10567-012-0114-y. View

Kazdin A . Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007; 3:1-27. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091432. View

10.

George S, Zeppieri Jr G, Cere A, Cere M, Borut M, Hodges M . A randomized trial of behavioral physical therapy interventions for acute and sub-acute low back pain (NCT00373867). Pain. 2008; 140(1):145-157. PMC: 2596955. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.029. View

11.

Lochting I, Storheim K, Werner E, Smastuen Cvancarova M, Grotle M . Evaluation of individualized quality of life and illness perceptions in low back pain. A patient education cluster randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2016; 99(12):1992-1998. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.05.015. View

12.

Osman A, Barrios F, Gutierrez P, Kopper B, Merrifield T, Grittmann L . The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: further psychometric evaluation with adult samples. J Behav Med. 2000; 23(4):351-65. DOI: 10.1023/a:1005548801037. View

13.

Siemonsma P, Stuive I, Roorda L, Vollebregt J, Walker M, Lankhorst G . Cognitive treatment of illness perceptions in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2012; 93(4):435-48. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20110150. View

14.

MacKinnon D, Lockwood C, Williams J . Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods. Multivariate Behav Res. 2010; 39(1):99. PMC: 2821115. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4. View

15.

Whittle R, Mansell G, Jellema P, van der Windt D . Applying causal mediation methods to clinical trial data: What can we learn about why our interventions (don't) work?. Eur J Pain. 2016; 21(4):614-622. PMC: 5396132. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.964. View

16.

Petrie K, Weinman J . Why illness perceptions matter. Clin Med (Lond). 2007; 6(6):536-9. PMC: 4952762. DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.6-6-536. View

17.

Lee H, McAuley J, Hubscher M, Kamper S, Traeger A, Moseley G . Does changing pain-related knowledge reduce pain and improve function through changes in catastrophizing?. Pain. 2016; 157(4):922-930. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000472. View

18.

L Werner E, Gross D, Lie S, Ihlebaek C . Healthcare provider back pain beliefs unaffected by a media campaign. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008; 26(1):50-6. PMC: 3406630. DOI: 10.1080/02813430801905664. View

19.

Skidmore J, Koenig A, Dyson S, Kupper A, Garner M, Keller C . Pain self-efficacy mediates the relationship between depressive symptoms and pain severity. Clin J Pain. 2014; 31(2):137-44. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000094. View

20.

L Werner E, Storheim K, Lochting I, Grotle M . The COPE LBP trial: cognitive patient education for low back pain--a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010; 11:33. PMC: 2839981. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-33. View