» Articles » PMID: 29186582

Safety of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients Who Routinely Use Anticoagulants

Overview
Journal Pain Med
Date 2017 Nov 30
PMID 29186582
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We assess the safety of performing the epidural placement or revision of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients whose anticoagulation has been held (termed "anticoagulant-suspended" patients) in accordance with the 2017 Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) guidelines.

Subjects: Patients undergoing SCS were included in this institutional review board-approved study.

Design: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed. Any adverse event occurring within 90 days after SCS lead placement/revision was included.

Results: A total of 225 patients who had a total of 239 surgeries including lead placement or lead revision were included; 182 patients were not on anticoagulants, 37 patients used one anticoagulant, and six patients used two or more anticoagulants. There were 13 adverse events. Anticoagulant use as a whole had no significant relationship to operative or postoperative adverse effects (χ2(1) = 1.613, P > 0.05). No anticoagulant on its own contributed significantly to adverse events; however, a small set of surgical cases showed a significantly greater incidence of adverse events for patients on enoxaparin used in combination with other anticoagulants (P < 0.05, N = 4).

Conclusions: This study is the first to demonstrate that anticoagulant-suspended patients have no increased risk of perioperative hemorrhagic or thromboembolic adverse effects following SCS surgery compared with nonanticoagulated patients. The findings of this study validate the safety of neuromodulation in anticoagulation-suspended patients, concurring with the findings of previously described case studies, which anecdotally described neuromodulation outcomes in patients whose anticoagulation regimen had been temporarily held.

Citing Articles

Identifying SCS Trial Responders Immediately After Postoperative Programming with ECAP Dose-Controlled Closed-Loop Therapy.

Pope J, Antony A, Petersen E, Rosen S, Sayed D, Hunter C Pain Ther. 2024; 13(5):1173-1185.

PMID: 38977651 PMC: 11393271. DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00631-4.

References
1.
Cameron T . Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg. 2004; 100(3 Suppl Spine):254-67. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2004.100.3.0254. View

2.
Gopal H, Fitzgerald J, McCrory C . Spinal cord stimulation for FBSS and CRPS: A review of 80 cases with on-table trial of stimulation. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015; 29(1):7-13. DOI: 10.3233/BMR-150608. View

3.
Kumar K, Caraway D, Rizvi S, Bishop S . Current challenges in spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2014; 17 Suppl 1:22-35. DOI: 10.1111/ner.12172. View

4.
Ashkan K, Alamri A, Ughratdar I . Anti-Coagulation and Deep Brain Stimulation: Never the Twain Shall Meet. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2015; 93(6):373-7. DOI: 10.1159/000441232. View

5.
Bernards C . Sophistry in medicine: lessons from the epidural space. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005; 30(1):56-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.10.004. View