» Articles » PMID: 29185826

Series: Practical Guidance to Qualitative Research. Part 2: Context, Research Questions and Designs

Overview
Journal Eur J Gen Pract
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Public Health
Date 2017 Nov 30
PMID 29185826
Citations 100
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the course of our supervisory work over the years, we have noticed that qualitative research tends to evoke a lot of questions and worries, so-called frequently asked questions (FAQs). This series of four articles intends to provide novice researchers with practical guidance for conducting high-quality qualitative research in primary care. By 'novice' we mean Master's students and junior researchers, as well as experienced quantitative researchers who are engaging in qualitative research for the first time. This series addresses their questions and provides researchers, readers, reviewers and editors with references to criteria and tools for judging the quality of qualitative research papers. This second article addresses FAQs about context, research questions and designs. Qualitative research takes into account the natural contexts in which individuals or groups function to provide an in-depth understanding of real-world problems. The research questions are generally broad and open to unexpected findings. The choice of a qualitative design primarily depends on the nature of the research problem, the research question(s) and the scientific knowledge one seeks. Ethnography, phenomenology and grounded theory are considered to represent the 'big three' qualitative approaches. Theory guides the researcher through the research process by providing a 'lens' to look at the phenomenon under study. Since qualitative researchers and the participants of their studies interact in a social process, researchers influence the research process. The first article described the key features of qualitative research, the third article will focus on sampling, data collection and analysis, while the last article focuses on trustworthiness and publishing.

Citing Articles

Investigation of the sustainability of breastfeeding and infant nutrition in the earthquake region based on mothers' experiences: a qualitative study.

Suzan O, Topal S, Caka S, Cinar N BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):953.

PMID: 40065273 PMC: 11895288. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-22137-0.


Barriers and facilitators to seeking psychological support among healthcare professionals: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Liu S, Hu Y, Pfaff H, Lei X, Qi Z, Feng X BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):848.

PMID: 40033267 PMC: 11877873. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21912-3.


Exploring the Parental Perspectives and Experiences With the Use of a Home Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Device.

Jarock C, Sheriko J, Hurtubise K Respir Care. 2025; 70(1):48-55.

PMID: 39964856 PMC: 11824876. DOI: 10.1089/respcare.11689.


Therapists' perceptions of the Carroll Upper Extremity Function Test to measure functional outcomes post-hand allotransplantation: A phenomenological study.

Heiple J, Danzl M, Jackson B, Ising T Hand Ther. 2025; :17589983251318937.

PMID: 39949866 PMC: 11815666. DOI: 10.1177/17589983251318937.


The Experience of Prisoners with Serious Mental Disorders Participating in a Dog-Assisted Therapy Program: A Qualitative Study.

Maximo-Bocanegra N, Palacios-Cena D, Gueita-Rodriguez J, Serrada-Tejeda S, Garcia-Medranda A, Pacheco-Guijarro A Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39943149 PMC: 11816068. DOI: 10.3390/ani15030379.


References
1.
Moser A, Korstjens I . Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 1: Introduction. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017; 23(1):271-273. PMC: 8816396. DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375093. View

2.
Moser A, Korstjens I . Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017; 24(1):9-18. PMC: 5774281. DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091. View

3.
Sandelowski M . Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Res Nurs Health. 2000; 23(4):334-40. DOI: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g. View

4.
Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A . Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012; 22(10):1435-43. DOI: 10.1177/1049732312452938. View

5.
Fleming V, Gaidys U, Robb Y . Hermeneutic research in nursing: developing a Gadamerian-based research method. Nurs Inq. 2003; 10(2):113-20. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.2003.00163.x. View