» Articles » PMID: 29184376

Bovine Origin : A New Zoonotic Agent?

Overview
Journal Vet World
Date 2017 Nov 30
PMID 29184376
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to assess the nature of animal origin strains. The study has zoonotic importance and aimed to compare virulence between two different hosts, i.e., bovine and ovine origin.

Materials And Methods: Conventional polymerase chain reaction-based methods used for the characterization of strains and chick embryo model employed for the assessment of virulence capacity of strains. All statistical tests carried on R program, version 3.0.4.

Results: After initial screening and molecular characterization of the prevalence of found to be 42.62% in bovine origin samples and 28.35% among ovine origin samples. Meanwhile, the methicillin-resistant prevalence is found to be meager in both the hosts. Among the samples, only 6.8% isolates tested positive for methicillin resistance. The biofilm formation quantified and the variation compared among the host. A Welch two-sample -test found to be statistically significant, t=2.3179, df=28.103, and p=0.02795. Chicken embryo model found effective to test the pathogenicity of the strains.

Conclusion: The study helped to conclude healthy bovines can act as reservoirs. Bovine origin strains are more virulent than ovine origin strains. Bovine origin strains have high probability to become zoonotic pathogen. Further, gene knock out studies may be conducted to conclude zoonocity of the bovine origin strains.

Citing Articles

[Methicillin-resistant in the Americas: systematic review and metanalysis of prevalence in food-producing animals resistente a la meticilina en la Región de las Américas: revisión sistemática y metanálisis de la prevalencia en la actividad...].

Barberato-Filho S, Bergamaschi C, Del Fiol F, Antoniazzi F, Stievano J, Justo A Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020; 44:e48.

PMID: 32973900 PMC: 7498297. DOI: 10.26633/RPSP.2020.48.


Microbial load in bio-slurry from different biogas plants in Bangladesh.

Islam M, Biswas P, Sabuj A, Haque Z, Saha C, Alam M J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2019; 6(3):376-383.

PMID: 31583235 PMC: 6760512. DOI: 10.5455/javar.2019.f357.

References
1.
Rahimi H, Saei H, Ahmadi M . Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus : Frequency and Antibiotic Resistance in Healthy Ruminants. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015; 8(10):e22413. PMC: 4640094. DOI: 10.5812/jjm.22413. View

2.
Duran N, Ozer B, Gulbol Duran G, Onlen Y, Demir C . Antibiotic resistance genes & susceptibility patterns in staphylococci. Indian J Med Res. 2012; 135:389-96. PMC: 3361877. View

3.
Cha J, Yoo J, Yoo J, Chung H, Park S, Kim H . Investigation of Biofilm Formation and its Association with the Molecular and Clinical Characteristics of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2013; 4(5):225-32. PMC: 3845227. DOI: 10.1016/j.phrp.2013.09.001. View

4.
Mulcahy M, Geoghegan J, Monk I, OKeeffe K, Walsh E, Foster T . Nasal colonisation by Staphylococcus aureus depends upon clumping factor B binding to the squamous epithelial cell envelope protein loricrin. PLoS Pathog. 2013; 8(12):e1003092. PMC: 3531522. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003092. View

5.
Gefen O, Balaban N . The importance of being persistent: heterogeneity of bacterial populations under antibiotic stress. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009; 33(4):704-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00156.x. View