» Articles » PMID: 29183275

Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Undercorrected Refractive Errors Among People with Diabetes in Shanghai

Overview
Journal BMC Ophthalmol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2017 Nov 30
PMID 29183275
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of undercorrected refractive error (URE) among people with diabetes in the Baoshan District of Shanghai, where data for undercorrected refractive error are limited.

Methods: The study was a population-based survey of 649 persons (aged 60 years or older) with diabetes in Baoshan, Shanghai in 2009. One copy of the questionnaire was completed for each subject. Examinations included a standardized refraction and measurement of presenting and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), tonometry, slit lamp biomicroscopy, and fundus photography.

Results: The calculated age-standardized prevalence rate of URE was 16.63% (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.76-19.49). For visual impairment subjects (presenting vision worse than 20/40 in the better eye), the prevalence of URE was up to 61.11%, and 75.93% of subjects could achieve visual acuity improvement by at least one line using appropriate spectacles. Under multiple logistic regression analysis, older age, female gender, non-farmer, increasing degree of myopia, lens opacities status, diabetic retinopathy (DR), body mass index (BMI) index lower than normal, and poor glycaemic control were associated with higher URE levels. Wearing distance eyeglasses was a protective factor for URE.

Conclusion: The undercorrected refractive error in diabetic adults was high in Shanghai. Health education and regular refractive assessment are needed for diabetic adults. Persons with diabetes should be more aware that poor vision is often correctable, especially for those with risk factors.

Citing Articles

The Magnitude of Refractive Error and Its Associated Factors Among Patients Visiting Ophthalmology Clinics in Southern Ethiopia, 2022.

Worku S, Getachew T, Nagarchi K, Shewangizaw M Clin Ophthalmol. 2023; 17:1801-1811.

PMID: 37383841 PMC: 10296544. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S408610.

References
1.
Wang L, Huang W, He M, Zheng Y, Huang S, Liu B . Causes and five-year incidence of blindness and visual impairment in urban Southern China: the Liwan Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54(6):4117-21. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-11911. View

2.
Rani P, Raman R, Rachapalli S, Kulothungan V, Kumaramanickavel G, Sharma T . Prevalence of refractive errors and associated risk factors in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus SN-DREAMS, report 18. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117(6):1155-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.10.025. View

3.
Zhang X, Gregg E, Cheng Y, Thompson T, Geiss L, Duenas M . Diabetes mellitus and visual impairment: national health and nutrition examination survey, 1999-2004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008; 126(10):1421-7. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.126.10.1421. View

4.
Saw S, Foster P, Gazzard G, Friedman D, Hee J, Seah S . Undercorrected refractive error in Singaporean Chinese adults: the Tanjong Pagar survey. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111(12):2168-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.05.032. View

5.
IDF Diabetes Atlas Group . Update of mortality attributable to diabetes for the IDF Diabetes Atlas: Estimates for the year 2013. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015; 109(3):461-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.05.037. View