» Articles » PMID: 29182949

Modeling the Potential Health Benefits of Lower Household Air Pollution After a Hypothetical Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) Cookstove Intervention

Overview
Journal Environ Int
Date 2017 Nov 29
PMID 29182949
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Improved biomass and advanced fuel cookstoves can lower household air pollution (HAP), but levels of fine particulate matter (PM) often remain above the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended interim target of 35μg/m.

Methods: Based on existing literature, we first estimate a range of likely levels of personal PM before and after a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) intervention. Using simulations reflecting uncertainty in both the exposure estimates and exposure-response coefficients, we estimate corresponding expected health benefits for systolic blood pressure (SBP) in adults, birthweight, and pneumonia incidence among children <2years old. We also estimate potential avoided premature mortality among those exposed.

Results: Our best estimate is that an LPG stove intervention would decrease personal PM exposure from approximately 270μg/m to approximately 70μg/m, due to likely continued use of traditional open-fire stoves. We estimate that this decrease would lead to a 5.5mmHg lower SBP among women over age 50, a 338g higher birthweight, and a 37% lower incidence of severe childhood pneumonia. We estimate that decreased SBP, if sustained, would result in a 5%-10% decrease in mortality for women over age 50. We estimate that higher birthweight would reduce infant mortality by 4 to 11 deaths per 1000 births; for comparison, the current global infant mortality rate is 32/1000 live births. Reduced exposure is estimated to prevent approximately 29 cases of severe pneumonia per year per 1000 children under 2, avoiding approximately 2-3 deaths/1000 per year. However, there are large uncertainties around all these estimates due to uncertainty in both exposure estimates and in exposure-response coefficients; all health effect estimates include the null value of no benefit.

Conclusions: An LPG stove intervention, while not likely to lower exposure to the WHO interim target level, is still likely to offer important health benefits.

Citing Articles

Exposure-response relationships for personal exposure to fine particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide, and black carbon and birthweight: an observational analysis of the multicountry Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial.

Balakrishnan K, Steenland K, Clasen T, Chang H, Johnson M, Pillarisetti A Lancet Planet Health. 2023; 7(5):e387-e396.

PMID: 37164515 PMC: 10186177. DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00052-9.


Widespread Clean Cooking Fuel Scale-Up and under-5 Lower Respiratory Infection Mortality: An Ecological Analysis in Ecuador, 1990-2019.

Gould C, Bejarano M, Kioumourtzoglou M, Lee A, Pillarisetti A, Schlesinger S Environ Health Perspect. 2023; 131(3):37017.

PMID: 36989076 PMC: 10056314. DOI: 10.1289/EHP11016.


Cleaning the Flue in Wood-Burning Stoves Is a Key Factor in Reducing Household Air Pollution.

Rahman M, Petersen H, Irshad H, Liu C, McDonald J, Sood A Toxics. 2022; 10(10).

PMID: 36287895 PMC: 9609584. DOI: 10.3390/toxics10100615.


Liquefied Petroleum Gas or Biomass for Cooking and Effects on Birth Weight.

Clasen T, Chang H, Thompson L, Kirby M, Balakrishnan K, Diaz-Artiga A N Engl J Med. 2022; 387(19):1735-1746.

PMID: 36214599 PMC: 9710426. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206734.


Household Air Pollution Concentrations after Liquefied Petroleum Gas Interventions in Rural Peru: Findings from a One-Year Randomized Controlled Trial Followed by a One-Year Pragmatic Crossover Trial.

Fandino-Del-Rio M, Kephart J, Williams K, Shade T, Adekunle T, Steenland K Environ Health Perspect. 2022; 130(5):57007.

PMID: 35549716 PMC: 9097958. DOI: 10.1289/EHP10054.


References
1.
Smith-Sivertsen T, Diaz E, Pope D, Lie R, Diaz A, McCracken J . Effect of reducing indoor air pollution on women's respiratory symptoms and lung function: the RESPIRE Randomized Trial, Guatemala. Am J Epidemiol. 2009; 170(2):211-20. PMC: 8889940. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp100. View

2.
Salmasi G, Grady R, Jones J, McDonald S . Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010; 89(4):423-441. DOI: 10.3109/00016340903505748. View

3.
Hoek G, Krishnan R, Beelen R, Peters A, Ostro B, Brunekreef B . Long-term air pollution exposure and cardio- respiratory mortality: a review. Environ Health. 2013; 12(1):43. PMC: 3679821. DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-43. View

4.
Mehra D, Geraghty P, Hardigan A, Foronjy R . A comparison of the inflammatory and proteolytic effects of dung biomass and cigarette smoke exposure in the lung. PLoS One. 2013; 7(12):e52889. PMC: 3527613. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052889. View

5.
Northcross A, Chowdhury Z, McCracken J, Canuz E, Smith K . Estimating personal PM2.5 exposures using CO measurements in Guatemalan households cooking with wood fuel. J Environ Monit. 2010; 12(4):873-8. DOI: 10.1039/b916068j. View