» Articles » PMID: 29180331

[Effects of Luteinizing Hormone Supplementation on Outcomes of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer in Patients Undergoing GnRH-agonist Long Protocol]

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Nov 29
PMID 29180331
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) among patients in different conditions receiving luteinizing hormone supplementation in GnRH-agonist long protocol.

Methods: Between June, 2010 and December, 2015, 671 IVF-ET cycles with GnRH-agonist long protocol were performed at our center. These cycles were divided into group A with FSH only and group B with FSH and recombinant luteinizing hormone (r-LH) supplementation, and each group was divided into 4 subgroups according to age (<35 or ≥35) and the LH level on the initial day (<1.0 U/L or ≥1.0 U/L). The effects of LH supplementation on the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate were compared among different subgroups.

Results: No statistical significances were found between groups A and B in age, body mass index (BMI), basal FSH, basal LH, basal E2, Gn dosage, Gn day, LH on HCG day, E2 on HCG day, P on HCG day, number of oocytes, fertilization rate, available embryo rate or good quality embryo rate per oocyte, but the endometrium thickness on HCG day differed significantly between the two groups. In women below 35 years of age with a LH level on HCG day over 1.0 U/L, r-LH supplementation resulted in a clinical pregnancy rate of 60%, significantly lower than the rate of 79.55% in women without r-LH supplementation (P<0.05). In women over 35 years with a LH level below 1.0 U/L, r-LH supplementation resulted in an implantation rate of 44.74%, as compared with 24.74% in women without r-LH supplementation (P<0.05).

Conclusion: In the long protocol, LH supplementation does not improve the oocyte number, fertilization rate, or good quality embryo per oocyte, and does not bring benefits to women below 35 years with a low LH level (<1.0 U/L) or those over 35 years with normal LH level (≥1.0 U/L) after GnRH-agonist administration. But for women over 35 years with low LH levels, r-LH supplementation may improve the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate of IVF-ET cycles.

Citing Articles

Comparison between cycles of the same patients when using recombinant luteinizing hormone + recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), human menopausal gonadotropin + rFSH and rFSH only.

Tayyar A, Kahraman S Arch Med Sci. 2019; 15(3):673-679.

PMID: 31110533 PMC: 6524176. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2017.72408.

References
1.
Nakagawa K, Ohgi S, Nakashima A, Horikawa T, Sugiyama R, Saito H . The ratio of late-follicular to mid-follicular phase LH concentrations efficiently predicts ART outcomes in women undergoing ART treatment with GnRH-agonist long protocol and stimulation with recombinant FSH. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008; 25(8):359-64. PMC: 2582123. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-008-9243-0. View

2.
Tesarik J, Mendoza C . Effects of exogenous LH administration during ovarian stimulation of pituitary down-regulated young oocyte donors on oocyte yield and developmental competence. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17(12):3129-37. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.12.3129. View

3.
Wong P, Qiao J, Ho C, Ramaraju G, Wiweko B, Takehara Y . Current opinion on use of luteinizing hormone supplementation in assisted reproduction therapy: an Asian perspective. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011; 23(1):81-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.03.023. View

4.
Konig T, van der Houwen L, Overbeek A, Hendriks M, Beutler-Beemsterboer S, Kuchenbecker W . Recombinant LH supplementation to a standard GnRH antagonist protocol in women of 35 years or older undergoing IVF/ICSI: a randomized controlled multicentre study. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(10):2804-12. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det266. View

5.
Bosch E, Labarta E, Crespo J, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A . Impact of luteinizing hormone administration on gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles: an age-adjusted analysis. Fertil Steril. 2010; 95(3):1031-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.021. View