» Articles » PMID: 29179741

Dietary Energy Drives the Dynamic Response of Bovine Rumen Viral Communities

Overview
Journal Microbiome
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Genetics
Microbiology
Date 2017 Nov 29
PMID 29179741
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Rumen microbes play a greater role in host energy acquisition than that of gut-associated microbes in monogastric animals. Although genome-enabled advancements are providing access to the vast diversity of uncultivated microbes, our understanding of variables shaping rumen microbial communities is in its infancy. Viruses have been shown to impact microbial populations through a myriad of processes, including cell lysis and reprogramming of host metabolism. However, little is known about the processes shaping the distribution of rumen viruses or how viruses may modulate microbial-driven processes in the rumen. To this end, we investigated how rumen bacterial and viral community structure and function responded in five steers fed four randomized dietary treatments in a crossover design.

Results: Total digestible nutrients (TDN), a measure of dietary energy, best explained the variation in bacterial and viral communities. Additional ecological drivers of viral communities included dietary zinc content and microbial functional diversity. Using partial least squares regression, we demonstrate significant associations between the abundances of 267 viral populations and variables driving the variation in rumen viral communities. While rumen viruses were dynamic, 14 near ubiquitous viral populations were identified, suggesting the presence of a core rumen virome largely comprised of novel viruses. Moreover, analysis of virally encoded auxiliary metabolic genes (AMGs) indicates rumen viruses have glycosidic hydrolases to potentially augment the breakdown of complex carbohydrates to increase energy production. Other AMGs identified have a role in redirecting carbon to the pentose phosphate pathway and one carbon pools by folate to boost viral replication.

Conclusions: We demonstrate that rumen bacteria and viruses have differing responses and ecological drivers to dietary perturbation. Our results show that rumen viruses have implications for understanding the structuring of the previously identified core rumen microbiota and impacting microbial metabolism through a vast array of AMGs. AMGs in the rumen appear to have consequences for microbial metabolism that are largely in congruence with the current paradigm established in marine systems. This study provides a foundation for future hypotheses regarding the dynamics of viral-mediated processes in the rumen.

Citing Articles

The multi-kingdom microbiome catalog of the chicken gastrointestinal tract.

Wang Y, Qu M, Bi Y, Liu W, Ma S, Wan B Biosaf Health. 2025; 6(2):101-115.

PMID: 40078943 PMC: 11894977. DOI: 10.1016/j.bsheal.2024.02.006.


Effects of partial silage replacement with corn stover pellets on the rumen microbiota and serum metabolome of breeding cows.

Jiao C, Cui C, Qi Y, Zhang M, Zhao P, Chen S Front Microbiol. 2025; 16:1533851.

PMID: 40071207 PMC: 11895767. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1533851.


Rumen DNA virome in beef cattle reveals an unexplored diverse community with potential links to carcass traits.

Sato Y ISME Commun. 2025; 5(1):ycaf021.

PMID: 40041703 PMC: 11879238. DOI: 10.1093/ismeco/ycaf021.


Rumen DNA virome and its relationship with feed efficiency in dairy cows.

Liu X, Tang Y, Chen H, Liu J, Sun H Microbiome. 2025; 13(1):14.

PMID: 39819730 PMC: 11740651. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-024-02019-0.


Antiviral defense systems in the rumen microbiome.

Saenz J, Rios-Galicia B, Seifert J mSystems. 2025; 10(2):e0152124.

PMID: 39807869 PMC: 11834463. DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01521-24.


References
1.
Weitz J, Stock C, Wilhelm S, Bourouiba L, Coleman M, Buchan A . A multitrophic model to quantify the effects of marine viruses on microbial food webs and ecosystem processes. ISME J. 2015; 9(6):1352-64. PMC: 4438322. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2014.220. View

2.
Schloss P, Westcott S, Ryabin T, Hall J, Hartmann M, Hollister E . Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75(23):7537-41. PMC: 2786419. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09. View

3.
Gaia M, Benamar S, Boughalmi M, Pagnier I, Croce O, Colson P . Zamilon, a novel virophage with Mimiviridae host specificity. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4):e94923. PMC: 3991649. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094923. View

4.
Minot S, Sinha R, Chen J, Li H, Keilbaugh S, Wu G . The human gut virome: inter-individual variation and dynamic response to diet. Genome Res. 2011; 21(10):1616-25. PMC: 3202279. DOI: 10.1101/gr.122705.111. View

5.
Hendrix R, Smith M, Burns R, Ford M, Hatfull G . Evolutionary relationships among diverse bacteriophages and prophages: all the world's a phage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(5):2192-7. PMC: 26759. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.5.2192. View