» Articles » PMID: 29177409

Barriers and Facilitators Related to the Implementation of a Physiological Track and Trigger System: A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Evidence

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2017 Nov 28
PMID 29177409
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To identify the barriers to, and facilitators of, the implementation of physiological track and trigger systems (PTTSs), perceived by healthcare workers, through a systematic review of the extant qualitative literature.

Data Sources: Searches were performed in PUBMED, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Embase and Web of Science. The reference lists of included studies were also screened.

Study Selection: The electronic searches yielded 2727 papers. After removing duplicates, and further screening, a total of 10 papers were determined to meet the inclusion criteria and were reviewed.

Data Extraction: A deductive content analysis approach was taken to organizing and analysing the data. A framework consisting of two overarching dimensions ('User-related changes required to implement PTTSs effectively' and 'Factors that affect user-related changes'), 5 themes (staff perceptions of PTTSs and patient safety, workflow adjustment, PTTS, implementation process and local context) and 14 sub themes was used to classify the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of PTTSs.

Results Of Data Synthesis: Successful implementation of a PTTS must address the social context in which it is to be implemented by ensuring that the users believe that the system is effective and benefits patient care. The users must feel invested in the PTTS and its use must be supported by training to ensure that all healthcare workers, senior and junior, understand their role in using the system.

Conclusion: PTTSs can improve patient safety and quality of care. However, there is a need for a robust implementation strategy or the benefits of PTTSs will not be realized.

Citing Articles

Integrating patient and public involvement into co-design of healthcare improvement: a case study in maternity care.

Attal B, Leeding J, VAN DER Scheer J, Barry Z, Crookes E, Igwe S BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):352.

PMID: 40055700 PMC: 11889828. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12423-3.


Detecting and responding to deterioration of a baby during labour: surveys of maternity professionals to inform co-design and implementation of a new standardised approach.

VAN DER Scheer J, Blott M, Dixon-Woods M, Olsson A, Moxey J, Kelly S BMJ Open. 2025; 15(3):e084578.

PMID: 40050068 PMC: 11887309. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084578.


How to co-design a prototype of a clinical practice tool: a framework with practical guidance and a case study.

Woodward M, Dixon-Woods M, Randall W, Walker C, Hughes C, Blackwell S BMJ Qual Saf. 2023; 33(4):258-270.

PMID: 38124136 PMC: 10982632. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016196.


Nurses' and Physicians' Ideas on Initiatives for Effective Use of the Early Warning Score: A Participatory Study.

Molgaard R, Jorgensen L, Gronkjaer M, Madsen J, Christensen E, Voldbjerg S Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2023; 10:23333936231210147.

PMID: 38028737 PMC: 10676632. DOI: 10.1177/23333936231210147.


The COVID-19 Pandemic's impact on sustainability and expansion of a Pediatric Early Warning System in resource-limited hospitals.

Wiphatphumiprates P, Graetz D, Ferrara G, Puerto-Torres M, Gillipelli S, Elish P Cancer Med. 2023; 12(10):11878-11888.

PMID: 37022012 PMC: 10242859. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5876.