» Articles » PMID: 29172020

Evaluation of the Effect of Different Post Materials and Adhesive Systems on the Bonding Strength of Short-post Technique for Primary Teeth

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2017 Nov 25
PMID 29172020
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The most important process in treating grossly decayed teeth, including decay in the pulp, is the ability to hold a retainer in for a short time.

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the bond strengths of different adhesive systems and post materials on primary teeth.

Design: One hundred and twenty extracted maxillar primary central incisor teeth were randomly divided into two main groups (total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems) and five subgroups (1: control-nanohybrid composite resin, 2: pre-impregnated glass fiber, 3: unsaturated glass fiber, 4: polyethylene fiber, 5: short-fiber reinforced composite resin). The push-out test was performed using a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min.

Results: No statistically significant difference was detected between the two different adhesive systems and five different materials in terms of the maximum values measured for fractures in the specimens when both the adhesive materials and the short-post materials were evaluated separately (P > 0.05). However, as a result of multiple comparisons made, it was found that statistical differences between the groups applying the total-etch adhesive system occurred in Groups 3 and 5. The highest push-out test values were measured in Group 5 and Group 1, and the lowest value in Group 3. Although the fracture type distribution in the total-etch adhesive system groups was not statistically different based on the material used (χ  = 11,865; P = 0.309), the self-etch adhesive systems did show differences (χ  = 28,463; P < 0.001). Both the total-etch and the self-etch adhesive system groups showed mostly adhesive failures.

Conclusion: The fiber-reinforced and nanohybrid composite resin had higher values in the short-post technique, and there was no significant difference between the different fiber posts.

Citing Articles

Comparison of shear bond strength of different types of intracanal posts in restoring extensively damaged primary anterior teeth.

Asghari Mollabashi S, Nourmohamadi S, Nakhostin A J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024; 18(2):95-101.

PMID: 39071211 PMC: 11282202. DOI: 10.34172/joddd.39232.


Mechanical Properties and Clinical Success of Intracanal Posts in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Shanmugam Y, Raghu A, Muthu M, Haridoss S, Swaminathan K, Vignesh K Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024; 16(Suppl 3):293-305.

PMID: 38268626 PMC: 10804303. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2697.


Comparison of the Pull-Out Resistance of Grossly Decayed Primary Anterior Teeth Restored With Two Different Intracanal Posts: An In Vitro Study.

Hijaz A, Altinawi M, Katbeh I, Gergos E, Alhamzah G Cureus. 2023; 15(3):e35643.

PMID: 37009392 PMC: 10065127. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35643.


Comparison of Different Adhesive Systems on Bond Strength of Resin Composite Posts Placed in Primary Teeth.

Bahrololoomi Z, Mehravar F Int J Dent. 2022; 2022:1968781.

PMID: 36072557 PMC: 9444449. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1968781.


Travel beyond Clinical Uses of Fiber Reinforced Composites (FRCs) in Dentistry: A Review of Past Employments, Present Applications, and Future Perspectives.

Scribante A, Vallittu P, Ozcan M, Lassila L, Gandini P, Sfondrini M Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:1498901.

PMID: 30426003 PMC: 6217899. DOI: 10.1155/2018/1498901.