» Articles » PMID: 29171118

Translesional Pressure Gradient and Leptomeningeal Collateral Status in Symptomatic Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis

Overview
Journal Eur J Neurol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Nov 25
PMID 29171118
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Leptomeningeal collateral (LMC) status governs the prognosis of large artery occlusive stroke, although factors determining LMC status are not fully elucidated. The aim was to investigate metrics affecting LMC status in such patients by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models based on computed tomography angiography (CTA).

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients with recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack attributed to atherosclerotic M1 middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis (50%-99%) were recruited. Demographic, clinical and imaging data of these patients were collected. Ipsilesional LMC status was graded as good or poor by assessing the laterality of anterior and posterior cerebral arteries in CTA. A CFD model based on CTA was constructed to reflect focal hemodynamics in the distal internal carotid artery, M1 MCA and A1 anterior cerebral artery. Pressure gradients were calculated across culprit MCA stenotic lesions in CFD models. Predictors for good LMC status were sought in univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: Amongst the 85 patients enrolled (mean age 61.5 ± 10.9 years), 38 (44.7%) had good ipsilesional LMC status. The mean pressure gradient across MCA lesions was 14.8 ± 18.1 mmHg. Advanced age (P = 0.030) and a larger translesional pressure gradient (P = 0.029) independently predicted good LMCs. A lower fasting blood glucose level also showed a trend for good LMCs (P = 0.058).

Conclusions: Our study suggested a correlation between translesional pressure gradient and maturation of LMCs in intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Further studies with more exquisite and dynamic monitoring of cerebral hemodynamics and LMC evolution are needed to verify the current findings.

Citing Articles

Panvascular concept in the evaluation and treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.

Tang J, Zhou G, Lu Y, Shi S, Cheng L, Xiang J Front Neurol. 2025; 15():1460124.

PMID: 39777318 PMC: 11704892. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1460124.


More severe cerebral small vessel disease associated with poor leptomeningeal collaterals in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.

Liu Y, Li S, Tian X, Abrigo J, Lam B, Wei J J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2024; :271678X241292537.

PMID: 39422042 PMC: 11563535. DOI: 10.1177/0271678X241292537.


Clinical implications of haemodynamics in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis by computational fluid dynamics modelling: a systematic review.

Liu Y, Li S, Liu H, Tian X, Liu Y, Li Z Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024; 10(1):16-24.

PMID: 38806205 PMC: 11877427. DOI: 10.1136/svn-2024-003202.


Cerebral hemodynamics and stroke risks in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with internal versus cortical borderzone infarcts: A computational fluid dynamics study.

Li S, Tian X, Ip B, Feng X, Ip H, Abrigo J J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2023; 44(4):516-526.

PMID: 37898104 PMC: 10981396. DOI: 10.1177/0271678X231211449.


Hemodynamics combined with inflammatory indicators exploring relationships between ischemic stroke and symptomatic middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic stenosis.

Wu X, Liu Y, Huang L, Guo X, Cai W, Luo B Eur J Med Res. 2023; 28(1):378.

PMID: 37752519 PMC: 10523698. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01344-8.