» Articles » PMID: 29170896

Modern Treatments of Haemophilia: Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses and Future Directions

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2017 Nov 25
PMID 29170896
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cost is currently one of the most important aspects in haemophilia care. Factor concentrates absorb more than 90% of healthcare direct costs of haemophilia care, and the debate regarding the high cost of haemophilia treatments and their different use across different countries is increasing.

Objective: The objective of this study was to review cost-effectiveness analyses conducted on treatment options in haemophilia, focusing on their results and their strengths and limitations; to highlight the possible issues associated with economic evaluations of new treatment options.

Methods: Electronic searches in PubMed and EMBASE were performed to retrieve papers published between November 2015 and September 2017 to update the previous review of economic evaluations of haemophilia treatments by Drummond et al. Reference lists of included articles and reviews were examined for relevant studies, which were assessed for their quality and their empirical results.

Results: Twenty-six relevant economic analyses were identified; 15 (57.7%) were conducted in patients with haemophilia with inhibitors while 11 (42.3%) involved patients without inhibitors. There were methodological variations among the included studies, and differences in the treatment schemes make a comparative assessment of interventions for patients with haemophilia difficult. Only immune tolerance induction showed consistent results in its cost-saving profile compared with the treatment with bypassing agents.

Conclusions: Economic evaluations of haemophilia treatments are increasing, but the identification of general cost-effectiveness trends is still difficult in these studies. We are now facing a new era in haemophilia management with a soaring need for high-quality economic evaluations, performed through proactive collaboration between clinical experts, budget holders and health economists.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Prophylactic Strategies for Hemophilia A Management: A Real-World, Longitudinal Observational Study.

Chiou S, Lin C, Weng T, Wang J, Chou S, Peng C Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2024; 11(4):711-723.

PMID: 39565566 PMC: 11589035. DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00452-z.


Economic Burden of Haemophilia from a Societal Perspective: A Scoping Review.

El-Sayed A, Bolous N Pharmacoecon Open. 2024; 9(2):179-205.

PMID: 39548037 PMC: 11865401. DOI: 10.1007/s41669-024-00540-4.


Real-World Amount of Clotting Factor Products and Non-Factor Products Dispensed and Annual Medical Expenditures for Japanese Patients with Haemophilia A.

Bingo M, Fukutake K, Togo K, Xu L, Alvir J, Winburn I Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2024; 11(3):541-552.

PMID: 39127822 PMC: 11365868. DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00420-7.


Emicizumab prophylaxis for people with hemophilia A: Waste estimation and the Brazilian perspective.

Camelo R, Barbosa M, Henriques L, Martin A, Godman B, Junior A Saudi Pharm J. 2023; 31(12):101867.

PMID: 38028212 PMC: 10661532. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101867.


Rasch Measurement and Patient Reported Value Claims: A Primer for Hemophilia.

Langley P Innov Pharm. 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 37305607 PMC: 10256296. DOI: 10.24926/iip.v13i4.5111.


References
1.
Feldman B, Aledort L, Bullinger M, Delaney F, Doria A, Funk S . The economics of haemophilia prophylaxis: governmental and insurer perspectives. Proceedings of the Second International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) symposium. Haemophilia. 2007; 13(6):745-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2007.01542.x. View

2.
Heemstra H, Zwaan T, Hemels M, Feldman B, Blanchette V, Kern M . Cost of severe haemophilia in Toronto. Haemophilia. 2005; 11(3):254-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01082.x. View

3.
Leissinger C, Gringeri A, Antmen B, Berntorp E, Biasoli C, Carpenter S . Anti-inhibitor coagulant complex prophylaxis in hemophilia with inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(18):1684-92. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1104435. View

4.
Farrugia A, Cassar J, Kimber M, Bansal M, Fischer K, Auserswald G . Treatment for life for severe haemophilia A- A cost-utility model for prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment. Haemophilia. 2013; 19(4):e228-38. DOI: 10.1111/hae.12121. View

5.
O Odeyemi I, Dano A . Optimising immune tolerance induction strategies in the management of haemophilia patients with inhibitors: a cost-minimisation analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009; 25(1):239-50. DOI: 10.1185/03007990802633863. View