Biomaterials and Advanced Technologies for Hemostatic Management of Bleeding
Overview
Affiliations
Bleeding complications arising from trauma, surgery, and as congenital, disease-associated, or drug-induced blood disorders can cause significant morbidities and mortalities in civilian and military populations. Therefore, stoppage of bleeding (hemostasis) is of paramount clinical significance in prophylactic, surgical, and emergency scenarios. For externally accessible injuries, a variety of natural and synthetic biomaterials have undergone robust research, leading to hemostatic technologies including glues, bandages, tamponades, tourniquets, dressings, and procoagulant powders. In contrast, treatment of internal noncompressible hemorrhage still heavily depends on transfusion of whole blood or blood's hemostatic components (platelets, fibrinogen, and coagulation factors). Transfusion of platelets poses significant challenges of limited availability, high cost, contamination risks, short shelf-life, low portability, performance variability, and immunological side effects, while use of fibrinogen or coagulation factors provides only partial mechanisms for hemostasis. With such considerations, significant interdisciplinary research endeavors have been focused on developing materials and technologies that can be manufactured conveniently, sterilized to minimize contamination and enhance shelf-life, and administered intravenously to mimic, leverage, and amplify physiological hemostatic mechanisms. Here, a comprehensive review regarding the various topical, intracavitary, and intravenous hemostatic technologies in terms of materials, mechanisms, and state-of-art is provided, and challenges and opportunities to help advancement of the field are discussed.
Bicomponent nano- and microfiber aerogels for effective management of junctional hemorrhage.
Shahriar S, Andrabi S, Al-Gahmi A, Yan Z, McCarthy A, Wang C Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2403.
PMID: 40064972 PMC: 11893793. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57836-0.
Water absorption dynamics in medical foam: empirical validation of the Lucas-Washburn model.
Mu W, Sun H, Cao L Eur Phys J E Soft Matter. 2025; 48(3):13.
PMID: 40042719 PMC: 11882628. DOI: 10.1140/epje/s10189-025-00478-3.
Wang J, Yang Y, Xu H, Huang S, Guo B, Hu J Nanomicro Lett. 2025; 17(1):171.
PMID: 40025402 PMC: 11872855. DOI: 10.1007/s40820-024-01603-1.
Hou Q, He X, Guo M, Li X, Zhang Z, Xu X J Nanobiotechnology. 2025; 23(1):102.
PMID: 39939976 PMC: 11823261. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-025-03142-2.
Al-Gahmi A, Andrabi S, Shahriar S, Jara C, Xie J, Carlson M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4679.
PMID: 39920186 PMC: 11805960. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87193-3.