» Articles » PMID: 29164524

The Anchoring Effect in Metamemory Monitoring

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2017 Nov 23
PMID 29164524
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Judgments about future memory performance (metamemory judgments) are known to be susceptible to illusions and bias. Here we asked whether metamemory judgments are affected, like many other forms of judgment, by numerical anchors. Experiment 1 confirmed previous research showing an effect of informative anchors (e.g., past peer performance) on metamemory monitoring. In four further experiments, we then explored the effects of uninformative anchors. All of the experiments obtained significant anchoring effects on metamemory monitoring; in contrast, the anchors had no effect on recall itself. We also explored the anchoring effect on metamemory control (restudy choices) in Experiment 4. The results suggested that anchors can affect metamemory monitoring, which in turn affects metamemory control. The present research reveals that informative and, more importantly, uninformative numbers that have no influence on recall itself can bias metamemory judgments. On the basis of the current theoretical understanding of the anchoring effect and metamemory monitoring, these results offer insight into the processes that trigger metacognitive biases.

Citing Articles

The Anchoring Effect in Study Time Allocation: Labor-in-Vain versus Labor-and-Gain.

Li X, Xu H, Chu Y, Tang W, Liu X Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39062390 PMC: 11273422. DOI: 10.3390/bs14070567.


Age similarities in the anchoring effect in emotion intensity judgment.

Jin M, Peng H, Wang D BMC Psychol. 2023; 11(1):158.

PMID: 37189205 PMC: 10186746. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01101-w.


A Bayesian inference model for metamemory.

Hu X, Zheng J, Su N, Fan T, Yang C, Yin Y Psychol Rev. 2021; 128(5):824-855.

PMID: 34043396 PMC: 9006386. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000270.


Anchoring Effect of Performance Feedback on Accuracy of Metacognitive Monitoring in Preschool Children.

Urban K, Urban M Eur J Psychol. 2021; 17(1):104-118.

PMID: 33737977 PMC: 7957852. DOI: 10.5964/ejop.2397.

References
1.
Brewer N, Chapman G, Schwartz J, Bergus G . The influence of irrelevant anchors on the judgments and choices of doctors and patients. Med Decis Making. 2007; 27(2):203-11. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06298595. View

2.
Englich B, Mussweiler T, Strack F . Playing dice with criminal sentences: the influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005; 32(2):188-200. DOI: 10.1177/0146167205282152. View

3.
Galinsky A, Mussweiler T . First offers as anchors: the role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001; 81(4):657-69. View

4.
Bui Y, Pyc M, Bailey H . When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect". Memory. 2017; 26(6):771-783. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1406523. View

5.
Mueller M, Dunlosky J, Tauber S . The effect of identical word pairs on people's metamemory judgments: What are the contributions of processing fluency and beliefs about memory?. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015; 69(4):781-99. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1058404. View