» Articles » PMID: 29163462

Impact of Preformed Donor-Specific Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibody C1q-Binding Ability on Kidney Allograft Outcome

Overview
Journal Front Immunol
Date 2017 Nov 23
PMID 29163462
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The consolidation of single antigen beads (SAB-panIgG) assay in the detection of preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies has improved transplantation success. However, its high sensitivity has limited the allograft allocation for sensitized patients, increasing their waiting time. A modification of the standard SAB-panIgG assay allows the detection of that subset of antibodies capable of binding C1q (SAB-C1q assay). However, the clinical usefulness of SAB-C1q assay for determining the unacceptable mismatches is under discussion. We retrospectively analyzed the impact of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) according to the C1q-binding ability on allograft outcome, examining 389 single-kidney transplanted patients from deceased donors. Recipients with preformed C1q-binding DSA showed the lowest allograft survival up to 7 years (40.7%) compared to patients with preformed non-C1q-binding DSA (73.4%;  = 0.001) and without DSA (79.1%;  < 0.001). Allograft survival rate was similar between patients with preformed non-C1q-binding DSA and patients without preformed DSA ( = 0.403). Interestingly, among the high-mean fluorescence intensity DSA (≥10,000) population ( = 46), those patients whose DSA were further capable of binding C1q showed a poorer allograft outcome (38.4 vs. 68.9%;  = 0.041). Moreover, in our multivariate predictive model for assessing the risk of allograft loss, the presence of C1q-binding DSA (HR 4.012; CI 95% 2.326-6.919;  < 0.001) but not of non-C1q-binding DSA (HR 1.389; CI 95% 0.784-2.461;  = 0.260) remained an independent predictor after stratifying the DSA population according to the C1q-binding ability and adjusting the model for other pre-transplantation predictive factors including donor age, cold-ischemia time, and HLA-DR mismatches. In conclusion, the unacceptable mismatch definition according to the SAB-C1q assay would improve the risk stratification of allograft loss and increase the limited allograft allocation of highly sensitized patients, shortening their waiting time.

Citing Articles

Complement-activating donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation: systematic review, meta-analysis, and critical appraisal.

Al-Awadhi S, Raynaud M, Louis K, Bouquegneau A, Taupin J, Aubert O Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1265796.

PMID: 37849755 PMC: 10577173. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1265796.


Clinical Outcome of Kidney Transplant Recipients with C1q-Binding De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies: A Single-Center Experience.

Marinaki S, Vittoraki A, Tsiakas S, Kofotolios I, Darema M, Ioannou S J Clin Med. 2023; 12(13).

PMID: 37445510 PMC: 10342474. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134475.


Afucosylation of HLA-specific IgG1 as a potential predictor of antibody pathogenicity in kidney transplantation.

Bharadwaj P, Shrestha S, Pongracz T, Concetta C, Sharma S, Le Moine A Cell Rep Med. 2022; 3(11):100818.

PMID: 36384101 PMC: 9729883. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100818.


Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Study on the Impact of Donor-Specific Antibodies and on the Timing of Diagnosis.

Pereira P, Ribeiro B, Oliveira J, Santos S, Pedroso S, Tafulo S Cureus. 2022; 14(10):e30296.

PMID: 36381702 PMC: 9650953. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30296.


C3d-Positive Preformed DSAs Tend to Persist and Result in a Higher Risk of AMR after Kidney Transplants.

Choi S, Lee K, Park J, Kim K, Jang H, Huh W J Clin Med. 2020; 9(2).

PMID: 32019081 PMC: 7073748. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020375.


References
1.
Lawrence C, Willicombe M, Brookes P, Santos-Nunez E, Bajaj R, Cook T . Preformed complement-activating low-level donor-specific antibody predicts early antibody-mediated rejection in renal allografts. Transplantation. 2012; 95(2):341-6. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182743cfa. View

2.
Wongsaroj P, Kahwaji J, Vo A, Jordan S . Modern approaches to incompatible kidney transplantation. World J Nephrol. 2015; 4(3):354-62. PMC: 4491925. DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v4.i3.354. View

3.
Crespo M, Torio A, Mas V, Redondo D, Perez-Saez M, Mir M . Clinical relevance of pretransplant anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies: does C1q-fixation matter?. Transpl Immunol. 2013; 29(1-4):28-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2013.07.002. View

4.
Loupy A, Lefaucheur C, Vernerey D, Prugger C, Duong van Huyen J, Mooney N . Complement-binding anti-HLA antibodies and kidney-allograft survival. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(13):1215-26. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302506. View

5.
Tambur A, Herrera N, Haarberg K, Cusick M, Gordon R, Leventhal J . Assessing Antibody Strength: Comparison of MFI, C1q, and Titer Information. Am J Transplant. 2015; 15(9):2421-30. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13295. View