Impact of Preformed Donor-Specific Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibody C1q-Binding Ability on Kidney Allograft Outcome
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The consolidation of single antigen beads (SAB-panIgG) assay in the detection of preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies has improved transplantation success. However, its high sensitivity has limited the allograft allocation for sensitized patients, increasing their waiting time. A modification of the standard SAB-panIgG assay allows the detection of that subset of antibodies capable of binding C1q (SAB-C1q assay). However, the clinical usefulness of SAB-C1q assay for determining the unacceptable mismatches is under discussion. We retrospectively analyzed the impact of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) according to the C1q-binding ability on allograft outcome, examining 389 single-kidney transplanted patients from deceased donors. Recipients with preformed C1q-binding DSA showed the lowest allograft survival up to 7 years (40.7%) compared to patients with preformed non-C1q-binding DSA (73.4%; = 0.001) and without DSA (79.1%; < 0.001). Allograft survival rate was similar between patients with preformed non-C1q-binding DSA and patients without preformed DSA ( = 0.403). Interestingly, among the high-mean fluorescence intensity DSA (≥10,000) population ( = 46), those patients whose DSA were further capable of binding C1q showed a poorer allograft outcome (38.4 vs. 68.9%; = 0.041). Moreover, in our multivariate predictive model for assessing the risk of allograft loss, the presence of C1q-binding DSA (HR 4.012; CI 95% 2.326-6.919; < 0.001) but not of non-C1q-binding DSA (HR 1.389; CI 95% 0.784-2.461; = 0.260) remained an independent predictor after stratifying the DSA population according to the C1q-binding ability and adjusting the model for other pre-transplantation predictive factors including donor age, cold-ischemia time, and HLA-DR mismatches. In conclusion, the unacceptable mismatch definition according to the SAB-C1q assay would improve the risk stratification of allograft loss and increase the limited allograft allocation of highly sensitized patients, shortening their waiting time.
Al-Awadhi S, Raynaud M, Louis K, Bouquegneau A, Taupin J, Aubert O Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1265796.
PMID: 37849755 PMC: 10577173. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1265796.
Marinaki S, Vittoraki A, Tsiakas S, Kofotolios I, Darema M, Ioannou S J Clin Med. 2023; 12(13).
PMID: 37445510 PMC: 10342474. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134475.
Bharadwaj P, Shrestha S, Pongracz T, Concetta C, Sharma S, Le Moine A Cell Rep Med. 2022; 3(11):100818.
PMID: 36384101 PMC: 9729883. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100818.
Pereira P, Ribeiro B, Oliveira J, Santos S, Pedroso S, Tafulo S Cureus. 2022; 14(10):e30296.
PMID: 36381702 PMC: 9650953. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30296.
Choi S, Lee K, Park J, Kim K, Jang H, Huh W J Clin Med. 2020; 9(2).
PMID: 32019081 PMC: 7073748. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020375.