» Articles » PMID: 29162695

Parallel Epigenetic Modifications Induced by Hatchery Rearing in a Pacific Salmon

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Nov 23
PMID 29162695
Citations 67
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Wild stocks of Pacific salmonids have experienced sharp declines in abundance over the past century. Consequently, billions of fish are released each year for enhancing abundance and sustaining fisheries. However, the beneficial role of this widely used management practice is highly debated since fitness decrease of hatchery-origin fish in the wild has been documented. Artificial selection in hatcheries has often been invoked as the most likely explanation for reduced fitness, and most studies to date have focused on finding signatures of hatchery-induced selection at the DNA level. We tested an alternative hypothesis, that captive rearing induces epigenetic reprogramming, by comparing genome-wide patterns of methylation and variation at the DNA level in hatchery-reared coho salmon () with those of their wild counterparts in two geographically distant rivers. We found a highly significant proportion of epigenetic variation explained by the rearing environment that was as high as the one explained by the river of origin. The differentially methylated regions show enrichment for biological functions that may affect the capacity of hatchery-born smolts to migrate successfully in the ocean. Shared epigenetic variation between hatchery-reared salmon provides evidence for parallel epigenetic modifications induced by hatchery rearing in the absence of genetic differentiation between hatchery and natural-origin fish for each river. This study highlights epigenetic modifications induced by captive rearing as a potential explanatory mechanism for reduced fitness in hatchery-reared salmon.

Citing Articles

The interplay between epigenomic and transcriptomic variation during ecotype divergence in stickleback.

Luo M, Zhao J, Merila J, Barrett R, Guo B, Hu J BMC Biol. 2025; 23(1):70.

PMID: 40038570 PMC: 11881503. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-025-02176-0.


Genomic Signatures of Domestication in European Seabass ( L.) Reveal a Potential Role for Epigenetic Regulation in Adaptation to Captivity.

Moulistanos A, Papasakellariou K, Kavakiotis I, Gkagkavouzis K, Karaiskou N, Antonopoulou E Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(12):e70512.

PMID: 39629177 PMC: 11612516. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70512.


DNA Methylation Carries Signatures of Sublethal Effects Under Thermal Stress in Loggerhead Sea Turtles.

Yen E, Gilbert J, Balard A, Afonso I, Fairweather K, Newlands D Evol Appl. 2024; 17(9):e70013.

PMID: 39286762 PMC: 11403127. DOI: 10.1111/eva.70013.


The evolutionary consequences of interactions between the epigenome, the genome and the environment.

Baduel P, Sammarco I, Barrett R, Coronado-Zamora M, Crespel A, Diez-Rodriguez B Evol Appl. 2024; 17(7):e13730.

PMID: 39050763 PMC: 11266121. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13730.


Competitive interactions affect introgression and population viability amidst maladaptive hybridization.

Reed T, Kane A, McGinnity P, OSullivan R Evol Appl. 2024; 17(7):e13746.

PMID: 38957310 PMC: 11217556. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13746.


References
1.
Friedrich B, Feng Y, Cohen P, Risler T, Vandewalle A, Broer S . The serine/threonine kinases SGK2 and SGK3 are potent stimulators of the epithelial Na+ channel alpha,beta,gamma-ENaC. Pflugers Arch. 2003; 445(6):693-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00424-002-0993-8. View

2.
Aubin-Horth N, Landry C, Letcher B, Hofmann H . Alternative life histories shape brain gene expression profiles in males of the same population. Proc Biol Sci. 2005; 272(1573):1655-62. PMC: 1559854. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3125. View

3.
Feil R, Fraga M . Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Nat Rev Genet. 2012; 13(2):97-109. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3142. View

4.
Sundstrom L, Johnsson J . Experience and social environment influence the ability of young brown trout to forage on live novel prey. Anim Behav. 2001; 61(1):249-255. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1593. View

5.
Yeaman S . Local Adaptation by Alleles of Small Effect. Am Nat. 2015; 186 Suppl 1:S74-89. DOI: 10.1086/682405. View