» Articles » PMID: 29162180

Threat Vigilance and Socioeconomic Disparities in Metabolic Health

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2017 Nov 23
PMID 29162180
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A quarter of the global population meets diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome (MetS). MetS prevalence stratifies by socioeconomic status (SES), such that low SES is associated with higher MetS risk starting in childhood. Despite this trend, some low-SES children maintain good metabolic health across the life span, but the factors responsible for their resilience are not well understood. This study examined the role of threat vigilance as either a moderator or a mediator of the effects of low early life SES on adult metabolic risk. Three hundred twenty-five Canadians aged 15-55 participated (M = 36.4 years, SD = 10.7; 55.4% female). We coded parental occupational status between the ages of 0 and 5 to index early life SES. We used the International Diabetes Federation case definition for MetS based on waist circumference, blood pressure, triglyceride levels, HDL cholesterol, and glycosylated hemoglobin measures. Threat vigilance was assessed using the Weapons Identification Procedure, a visual discrimination paradigm that captures implicit perceptions of threat. Analyses supported the moderator hypothesis: low early life SES was associated with MetS diagnosis exclusively among those with high levels of threat vigilance. This suggests that low early life SES environments that heighten vigilance to threat might be particularly detrimental for metabolic health. Conversely, low threat vigilance may buffer against the metabolic risks associated with socioeconomic disadvantage.

Citing Articles

Sexual Minority Identity and Risky Alcohol Use: the Moderating Role of Aggressive Behavior.

Martin-Storey A, Zhao Z, Toomey R, Syvertsen A J Youth Adolesc. 2024; 54(1):196-208.

PMID: 39037558 DOI: 10.1007/s10964-024-02057-9.


Metabolic syndrome traits exhibit genotype-by-environment interaction in relation to socioeconomic status in the Mexican American family heart study.

Diego V, Manusov E, Mao X, Almeida M, Peralta J, Curran J Front Genet. 2024; 15:1240462.

PMID: 38495670 PMC: 10940335. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1240462.


Anxious to see you: Neuroendocrine mechanisms of social vigilance and anxiety during adolescence.

Wright E, Hostinar C, Trainor B Eur J Neurosci. 2019; 52(1):2516-2529.

PMID: 31782841 PMC: 7255921. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14628.


Protective factors for youth confronting economic hardship: Current challenges and future avenues in resilience research.

Hostinar C, Miller G Am Psychol. 2019; 74(6):641-652.

PMID: 31545638 PMC: 6760324. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000520.


Explaining the Relationship Between Minority Group Status and Health Disparities: A Review of Selected Concepts.

Ng J, Ward L, Shea M, Hart L, Guerino P, Hudson Scholle S Health Equity. 2019; 3(1):47-60.

PMID: 30868139 PMC: 6413828. DOI: 10.1089/heq.2018.0035.

References
1.
Gump B, Matthews K, Raikkonen K . Modeling relationships among socioeconomic status, hostility, cardiovascular reactivity, and left ventricular mass in African American and White children. Health Psychol. 1999; 18(2):140-50. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.18.2.140. View

2.
Miller G, Cohen S, Rabin B, Skoner D, Doyle W . Personality and tonic cardiovascular, neuroendocrine, and immune parameters. Brain Behav Immun. 1999; 13(2):109-23. DOI: 10.1006/brbi.1998.0545. View

3.
Treiber F, Harshfield G, Davis H, Kapuku G, Moore D . Stress responsivity and body fatness: links between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular risk factors in youth. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000; 896:435-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08163.x. View

4.
Lupien S, King S, Meaney M, McEwen B . Child's stress hormone levels correlate with mother's socioeconomic status and depressive state. Biol Psychiatry. 2000; 48(10):976-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00965-3. View

5.
Chen E, Matthews K . Cognitive appraisal biases: an approach to understanding the relation between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular reactivity in children. Ann Behav Med. 2001; 23(2):101-11. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2302_4. View