» Articles » PMID: 29162138

Predictability of the Effects of Facet Joint Infiltration in the Degenerate Lumbar Spine when Assessing MRI Scans

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 Nov 23
PMID 29162138
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Imaging results are frequently considered as hallmarks of disease by spine surgeons to plan their future treatment strategy. Numerous classification systems have been proposed to quantify or grade lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and thus objectify imaging findings. The clinical impact of the measured parameters remains, however, unclear. To evaluate the pathological significance of imaging findings in patients with multisegmental degenerative findings, clinicians can perform image-guided local infiltrations to target defined areas such as the facet joints. The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the correlation of MRI facet joint degeneration and spinal stenosis measurements with improvement obtained by image-guided intraarticular facet joint infiltration.

Methods: Fifty MRI scans of patients with chronic lumbar back pain were graded radiologically using a wide range of classification and measurement systems. The reported effect of facet joint injections at the site was recorded, and a comparative analysis performed.

Results: When we allocated patients according to their reported pain relief, 27 showed no improvement (0-30%), 16 reported good improvement (31-75%) and 7 reported excellent improvement (> 75%). MRI features assessed in this study did, however, not show any relevant correlation with reported pain after facet joint infiltration: Values for Kendall's tau ranged from τ = - 0.190 for neuroforaminal stenosis grading as suggested by Lee, to τ = 0.133 for posterior disc height as proposed by Hasegawa.

Conclusion: Despite the trend in evidence-based medicine to provide medical algorithms, our findings underline the continuing need for individualised spine care that, along with imaging techniques or targeted infiltrations, includes diagnostic dimensions such as good patient history and clinical examination to formulate a diagnosis.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03308149 , retrospectively registered October 2017.

Citing Articles

Lumbar Facet Joint Disease: What, Why, and When?.

Van Oosterwyck W, Vander Cruyssen P, Castille F, Van de Kelft E, Decaigny V Life (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39598277 PMC: 11595282. DOI: 10.3390/life14111480.


Association Between MRI Findings of Facet Arthropathy and Synovitis With Health-Related Outcome and Pain Scores Following Therapeutic Lumbar Facet Injections.

Green M, Hal M, Onimus M, Hoffman C, Goyal D, Potigailo V Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2024; 2024:7889539.

PMID: 39464206 PMC: 11511585. DOI: 10.1155/2024/7889539.


Osteoarthritis of zygapophysial joints as a cause of back pain and neck pain: a scoping review.

Bogduk N, MacVicar J Pain Med. 2024; 25(9):541-552.

PMID: 38702827 PMC: 11369356. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnae036.


The Role of Diagnostic Injections in Spinal Disorders: A Narrative Review.

Kim B, Concannon T, Barboza L, Khan T Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(12).

PMID: 34943548 PMC: 8700513. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122311.


Facet joint syndrome: from diagnosis to interventional management.

Perolat R, Kastler A, Nicot B, Pellat J, Tahon F, Attye A Insights Imaging. 2018; 9(5):773-789.

PMID: 30090998 PMC: 6206372. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-018-0638-x.

References
1.
Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Fellows B, Bakhit C . Prevalence of lumbar facet joint pain in chronic low back pain. Pain Physician. 2006; 2(3):59-64. View

2.
Weiner B, Patel R . The accuracy of MRI in the detection of lumbar disc containment. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008; 3:46. PMC: 2566558. DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-3-46. View

3.
Jackson R, Jacobs R, Montesano P . 1988 Volvo award in clinical sciences. Facet joint injection in low-back pain. A prospective statistical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988; 13(9):966-71. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198809000-00002. View

4.
Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, Tansey R, Wardlaw D, Smith F . Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(21):1919-24. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd. View

5.
Beers G, Carter A, Leiter B, TILAK S, Shah R . Interobserver discrepancies in distance measurements from lumbar spine CT scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985; 144(2):395-8. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.144.2.395. View