» Articles » PMID: 29161715

Management of Biochemical Recurrence After Primary Curative Treatment for Prostate Cancer: A Review

Overview
Journal Urol Int
Publisher Karger
Specialty Urology
Date 2017 Nov 22
PMID 29161715
Citations 102
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

How to manage patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with biochemical recurrence (BCR) following primary curative treatment is a controversial issue. Importantly, this prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-only recurrence is a surrogate neither of PCa-specific survival nor of overall survival. Physicians are therefore challenged with preventing or delaying the onset of clinical progression in those deemed at risk, while avoiding over-treating patients whose disease may never progress beyond PSA-only recurrence. Adjuvant therapy for radical prostatectomy (RP) or local radiotherapy (RT) has a role in certain at-risk patients, although it is not recommended in low-risk PCa owing to the significant side-effects associated with RT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The recommendations for salvage therapy differ depending on whether BCR occurs after RP or primary RT, and in either case, definitive evidence regarding the best strategy is lacking. Options for treatment of BCR after RP are RT at least to the prostatic bed, complete or intermittent ADT, or observation; for BCR after RT, salvage RP, cryotherapy, complete or intermittent ADT, brachytherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), or observation can be considered. Many patient- and cancer-specific factors need to be taken into account when deciding on the best strategy, and optimal management depends on the involvement of a multidisciplinary team, consultation with the patient themselves, and the adoption of an individualised approach. Improvements in imaging techniques may enable earlier detection of metastases, which will hopefully refine future management decisions.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis from KSER Update Series.

Kim D, Moon Y, Chung D, Jung H, Jeon S, Kang S Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(1).

PMID: 39859042 PMC: 11766646. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61010061.


DNA Methylation in Prostate Cancer: Clinical Implications and Potential Applications.

Muletier R, Bourgne C, Guy L, Douge A Cancer Med. 2025; 14(1):e70528.

PMID: 39783747 PMC: 11714017. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70528.


High-Intensity Focus Ultrasound Ablation in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Yang C, Barbulescu D, Marian L, Tung M, Ou Y, Wu C J Pers Med. 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 39728075 PMC: 11678519. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14121163.


PSA as the driving biomarker to manage low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients in clinical practice.

Ricevuto E, Morgani C, Seri F, Bruera G Asian J Androl. 2024; 26(6):567-568.

PMID: 39327840 PMC: 11614182. DOI: 10.4103/aja202468.


An Analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of Tc-99m PSMA SSPECT/CT in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer Compared with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT: A Single-center, Prospective Study.

Ora M, Saini V, Dixit M, Singh U, Gambhir S Indian J Nucl Med. 2024; 39(3):170-176.

PMID: 39291065 PMC: 11404733. DOI: 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_8_24.