» Articles » PMID: 29156741

Screening Epitopes on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Autoantigens with a Peptide Array

Overview
Journal Oncotarget
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Nov 22
PMID 29156741
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a common autoimmune disease. Many autoantibodies are closely associated with SLE. However, the specific epitopes recognized and bound by these autoantibodies are still unclear. This study screened the binding epitopes of SLE-related autoantibodies using a high-throughput screening method. Epitope prediction on 12 SLE-related autoantigens was performed using the Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource (IEDB) software. The predicted epitopes were synthesized into peptides and developed into a peptide array. Serum IgG from 50 SLE patients and 25 healthy controls was detected using the peptide array. The results were then validated using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The diagnostic efficiency of each epitope was analyzed using a ROC curve. Seventy-three potential epitopes were screened for using the IEDB software after the epitopes on the 12 SLE-related autoantigens were analyzed. Peptide array screening revealed that the levels of the autoantibodies recognized and bound by 4 peptide antigens were significantly upregulated in the serum of SLE patients ( < 0.05). The ELISA results showed that the 4 antigens with significantly increased serum autoantibodies levels in SLE patients were acidic ribosomal phosphoprotein (P0)-4, acidic ribosomal phosphoprotein (P0)-11, DNA topoisomerase 1 (full length)-1, and U1-SnRNP 68/70 KDa-1 ( < 0.05), and the areas under the ROC curve for diagnosing SLE on the basis of these peptides were 0.91, 0.90, 0.93, and 0.91, respectively. Many autoantibodies specifically expressed in the serum of patients with SLE can be detected by specific peptide fragments and may be used as markers in clinical auxiliary diagnoses.

Citing Articles

Emerging Molecular Markers Towards Potential Diagnostic Panels for Lupus.

Tan G, Baby B, Zhou Y, Wu T Front Immunol. 2022; 12:808839.

PMID: 35095896 PMC: 8792845. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.808839.


Protein-Based Immunome Wide Association Studies (PIWAS) for the Discovery of Significant Disease-Associated Antigens.

Haynes W, Kamath K, Waitz R, Daugherty P, Shon J Front Immunol. 2021; 12:625311.

PMID: 33986742 PMC: 8110919. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.625311.


Anti-retinoblastoma Protein Antibodies: A New Specificity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Associated With Protection Against Lupus Nephritis.

Goules A, Li J, Antiochos B, Goldman D, Rosen A, Petri M ACR Open Rheumatol. 2019; 1(5):287-291.

PMID: 31777805 PMC: 6857985. DOI: 10.1002/acr2.1036.

References
1.
Hochberg M . Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997; 40(9):1725. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780400928. View

2.
Unlu O, Zuily S, Erkan D . The clinical significance of antiphospholipid antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Eur J Rheumatol. 2016; 3(2):75-84. PMC: 5042235. DOI: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2015.0085. View

3.
Kuhn A, Bonsmann G, Anders H, Herzer P, Tenbrock K, Schneider M . The Diagnosis and Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015; 112(25):423-32. PMC: 4558874. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0423. View

4.
Cozzani E, Drosera M, Gasparini G, Parodi A . Serology of Lupus Erythematosus: Correlation between Immunopathological Features and Clinical Aspects. Autoimmune Dis. 2014; 2014:321359. PMC: 3932647. DOI: 10.1155/2014/321359. View

5.
Price R, Deeks S . Antiretroviral drug treatment interruption in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults: Clinical and pathogenetic implications for the central nervous system. J Neurovirol. 2004; 10 Suppl 1:44-51. DOI: 10.1080/753312752. View