» Articles » PMID: 29153265

Hepatitis C Virus Treatment As Prevention in an Extended Network of People Who Inject Drugs in the USA: a Modelling Study

Overview
Date 2017 Nov 21
PMID 29153265
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Chronic infections with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV are highly prevalent in the USA and concentrated in people who inject drugs. Treatment as prevention with highly effective new direct-acting antivirals is a prospective HCV elimination strategy. We used network-based modelling to analyse the effect of this strategy in HCV-infected people who inject drugs in a US city.

Methods: Five graph models were fit using data from 1574 people who inject drugs in Hartford, CT, USA. We used a degree-corrected stochastic block model, based on goodness-of-fit, to model networks of injection drug users. We simulated transmission of HCV and HIV through this network with varying levels of HCV treatment coverage (0%, 3%, 6%, 12%, or 24%) and varying baseline HCV prevalence in people who inject drugs (30%, 60%, 75%, or 85%). We compared the effectiveness of seven treatment-as-prevention strategies on reducing HCV prevalence over 10 years and 20 years versus no treatment. The strategies consisted of treatment assigned to either a randomly chosen individual who injects drugs or to an individual with the highest number of injection partners. Additional strategies explored the effects of treating either none, half, or all of the injection partners of the selected individual, as well as a strategy based on respondent-driven recruitment into treatment.

Findings: Our model estimates show that at the highest baseline HCV prevalence in people who inject drugs (85%), expansion of treatment coverage does not substantially reduce HCV prevalence for any treatment-as-prevention strategy. However, when baseline HCV prevalence is 60% or lower, treating more than 120 (12%) individuals per 1000 people who inject drugs per year would probably eliminate HCV within 10 years. On average, assigning treatment randomly to individuals who inject drugs is better than targeting individuals with the most injection partners. Treatment-as-prevention strategies that treat additional network members are among the best performing strategies and can enhance less effective strategies that target the degree (ie, the highest number of injection partners) within the network.

Interpretation: Successful HCV treatment as prevention should incorporate the baseline HCV prevalence and will achieve the greatest benefit when coverage is sufficiently expanded.

Funding: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Citing Articles

Modeling of randomized hepatitis C vaccine trials: Bridging the gap between controlled human infection models and real-word testing.

Mackesy-Amiti M, Gutfraind A, Tatara E, Collier N, Cotler S, Page K PNAS Nexus. 2025; 4(1):pgae564.

PMID: 39777292 PMC: 11704953. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae564.


Control and Elimination of Hepatitis C Virus Among People With HIV in Australia: Extended Follow-up of the CEASE Cohort (2014-2023).

Martinello M, Carson J, Post J, Finlayson R, Baker D, Read P Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024; 11(12):ofae665.

PMID: 39691290 PMC: 11650530. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae665.


Influence of polysubstance use on the health-related quality of life among people who inject drugs undergoing opioid agonist treatment following treatment for hepatitis c virus.

Gormley M, Zhang W, Self S, Ewing J, Heo M, Roth P J Subst Use. 2024; 29(5):836-842.

PMID: 39502837 PMC: 11534293. DOI: 10.1080/14659891.2023.2254391.


Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Incidence, STI Screening, and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Preexposure Prophylaxis Uptake in United States Veterans With Opioid Use Disorder in Long Island, New York.

Srivastava P, Modi V, Lier A Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024; 11(8):ofae429.

PMID: 39086462 PMC: 11289836. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae429.


Potential impact of curative and preventive interventions toward hepatitis C elimination in people who inject drugs-A network modeling study.

Zhu L, Thompson W, Hagan L, Randall L, Rudolph A, Young A Int J Drug Policy. 2024; 130:104539.

PMID: 39033645 PMC: 11347083. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104539.


References
1.
Kim A, Schulze Zur Wiesch J, Kuntzen T, Timm J, Kaufmann D, Duncan J . Impaired hepatitis C virus-specific T cell responses and recurrent hepatitis C virus in HIV coinfection. PLoS Med. 2006; 3(12):e492. PMC: 1705826. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030492. View

2.
. Global prevalence and genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus infection in 2015: a modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 2(3):161-176. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30181-9. View

3.
Costenbader E, Astone N, Latkin C . The dynamics of injection drug users' personal networks and HIV risk behaviors. Addiction. 2006; 101(7):1003-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01431.x. View

4.
Rolls D, Daraganova G, Sacks-Davis R, Hellard M, Jenkinson R, McBryde E . Modelling hepatitis C transmission over a social network of injecting drug users. J Theor Biol. 2011; 297:73-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.12.008. View

5.
Strader D . Coinfection with HIV and hepatitis C virus in injection drug users and minority populations. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41 Suppl 1:S7-13. DOI: 10.1086/429489. View