» Articles » PMID: 29151444

Effect of Morphological Changes in Feather Follicles of Chicken Carcasses After Defeathering and Chilling on the Degree of Skin Contamination by Campylobacter Species

Overview
Journal J Vet Med Sci
Date 2017 Nov 21
PMID 29151444
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli are the leading causes of enteric infections in many developed countries. Healthy chickens are considered to act as reservoirs of campylobacters, as the organisms colonize the intestinal tract. Once infected birds enter a processing plant, contamination of chicken carcasses with campylobacters occurs over the entire skin during defeathering and evisceration due to leakage of crop and/or intestinal contents. Although the role of feather follicles in the contamination of chicken carcasses by campylobacters during processing is still debatable, it has been considered that the microorganisms would be entrapped and retained in the follicles due to the morphological changes resulting from defeathering and chilling. In the present study, we observed the morphology of feather follicles in chicken carcasses after defeathering and chilling. A total of 3,133 feather follicles were examined for morphological changes before and after chilling. Shortly after defeathering, most (91.5%) of the follicles were closed, whereas after chilling they were either closed (85.5%) or open (6%), although a small proportion of enlarged follicles became smaller or closed (2.6%). Moreover, 5.9% of the follicles that were slightly open became further enlarged after chilling. Furthermore, the proportion of enlarged feather follicles that became closed after chilling showed no discernible relationship with the degree of campylobacter contamination in different areas of the carcass skin, suggesting that campylobacters may not be confined to feather follicles as a result of the morphological changes attributable to defeathering and chilling.

Citing Articles

Mitigating the attachment of Salmonella Infantis on isolated poultry skin with cetylpyridinium chloride.

Dittoe D, Olson E, Wythe L, Lawless Z, Thompson D, Perry L PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0293549.

PMID: 38127975 PMC: 10735015. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293549.


Complex Internal Microstructure of Feather Follicles on Chicken Skin Promotes the Bacterial Cross-Contamination of Carcasses During the Slaughtering Process.

Zhang X, Peng Z, Li P, Mao Y, Shen R, Tao R Front Microbiol. 2020; 11:571913.

PMID: 33042079 PMC: 7527466. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.571913.


Current Status of Food Poisoning in Japan.

Vetchapitak T, Misawa N Food Saf (Tokyo). 2020; 7(3):61-73.

PMID: 31998589 PMC: 6977775.

References
1.
Mangen M, Havelaar A, Poppe K, de Wit G . Cost-utility analysis to control Campylobacter on chicken meat: dealing with data limitations. Risk Anal. 2007; 27(4):815-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00925.x. View

2.
Chen X, Bauermeister L, Hill G, Singh M, Bilgili S, McKEE S . Efficacy of various antimicrobials on reduction of salmonella and campylobacter and quality attributes of ground chicken obtained from poultry parts treated in a postchill decontamination tank. J Food Prot. 2014; 77(11):1882-8. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-114. View

3.
Mead G, Hudson W, Hinton M . Effect of changes in processing to improve hygiene control on contamination of poultry carcasses with campylobacter. Epidemiol Infect. 1995; 115(3):495-500. PMC: 2271579. DOI: 10.1017/s0950268800058659. View

4.
Ruiz-Palacios G . The health burden of Campylobacter infection and the impact of antimicrobial resistance: playing chicken. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44(5):701-3. DOI: 10.1086/509936. View

5.
Oosterom J, Notermans S, Karman H, Engels G . Origin and Prevalence of Campylobaeter jejuni in Poultry Processing. J Food Prot. 2019; 46(4):339-344. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-46.4.339. View