» Articles » PMID: 29149701

Risk Factor Analysis of Equine Strongyle Resistance to Anthelmintics

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Parasitology
Date 2017 Nov 18
PMID 29149701
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intestinal strongyles are the most problematic endoparasites of equids as a result of their wide distribution and the spread of resistant isolates throughout the world. While abundant literature can be found on the extent of anthelmintic resistance across continents, empirical knowledge about associated risk factors is missing. This study brought together results from anthelmintic efficacy testing and risk factor analysis to provide evidence-based guidelines in the field. It involved 688 horses from 39 French horse farms and riding schools to both estimate Faecal Egg Count Reduction (FECR) after anthelmintic treatment and to interview farm and riding school managers about their practices. Risk factors associated with reduced anthelmintic efficacy in equine strongyles were estimated across drugs using a marginal modelling approach. Results demonstrated ivermectin efficacy (96.3% ± 14.5% FECR), the inefficacy of fenbendazole (42.8% ± 33.4% FECR) and an intermediate profile for pyrantel (90.3% ± 19.6% FECR). Risk factor analysis provided support to advocate for FEC-based treatment regimens combined with individual anthelmintic dosage and the enforcement of tighter biosecurity around horse introduction. The combination of these measures resulted in a decreased risk of drug resistance (relative risk of 0.57, p = 0.02). Premises falling under this typology also relied more on their veterinarians suggesting practitionners play an important role in the sustainability of anthelmintic usage. Similarly, drug resistance risk was halved in premises with frequent pasture rotation and with stocking rate below five horses/ha (relative risk of 0.53, p < 0.01). This is the first empirical risk factor analysis for anthelmintic resistance in equids. Our findings should guide the implementation of more sustained strongyle management in the field.

Citing Articles

Gastro-Intestinal Microbiota in Equines and Its Role in Health and Disease: The Black Box Opens.

Chaucheyras-Durand F, Sacy A, Karges K, Apper E Microorganisms. 2022; 10(12).

PMID: 36557769 PMC: 9783266. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10122517.


Identifying 3 larval stages of common strongylid and non-strongylid nematodes (class: Nematoda) infecting Egyptian equines based on morphometric analysis.

Amer M, Desouky A, Helmy N, Abdou A, Sorour S BMC Vet Res. 2022; 18(1):432.

PMID: 36503529 PMC: 9743504. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-022-03526-8.


Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: Current status and emerging trends.

Nielsen M Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2022; 20:76-88.

PMID: 36342004 PMC: 9630620. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2022.10.005.


Effect of sainfoin () on cyathostomin eggs excretion, larval development, larval community structure and efficacy of ivermectin treatment in horses.

Malsa J, Courtot E, Boisseau M, Dumont B, Gombault P, Kuzmina T Parasitology. 2022; 149(11):1439-1449.

PMID: 35929352 PMC: 10090777. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182022000853.


First Report of Multiple Drug-resistant Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Sheep in Arbat District, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq Detected By and Methods.

Othman Dyary H, Banaz H J Vet Res. 2021; 65(3):293-299.

PMID: 34917841 PMC: 8643086. DOI: 10.2478/jvetres-2021-0047.


References
1.
Smith G, Grenfell B, Isham V, Cornell S . Anthelmintic resistance revisited: under-dosing, chemoprophylactic strategies, and mating probabilities. Int J Parasitol. 1999; 29(1):77-91; discussion 93-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(98)00186-6. View

2.
Traversa D, Klei T, Iorio R, Paoletti B, Lia R, Otranto D . Occurrence of anthelmintic resistant equine cyathostome populations in central and southern Italy. Prev Vet Med. 2007; 82(3-4):314-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.07.006. View

3.
Geurden T, van Doorn D, Claerebout E, Kooyman F, De Keersmaecker S, Vercruysse J . Decreased strongyle egg re-appearance period after treatment with ivermectin and moxidectin in horses in Belgium, Italy and The Netherlands. Vet Parasitol. 2014; 204(3-4):291-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.04.013. View

4.
Lind E, Rautalinko E, Uggla A, Waller P, Morrison D, Hoglund J . Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms. Acta Vet Scand. 2007; 49:25. PMC: 2093939. DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-49-25. View

5.
Murphy D, Love S . The pathogenic effects of experimental cyathostome infections in ponies. Vet Parasitol. 1997; 70(1-3):99-110. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4017(96)01153-3. View