» Articles » PMID: 29147797

Is It Appropriate to Measure Age-related Lumbar Disc Degeneration on the Mid-sagittal MR Image? A Quantitative Image Study

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 Nov 18
PMID 29147797
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Even though phenotypes of disc degeneration vary on different sagittal magnetic resonance images (MRI), measurements typically are acquired on the mid-sagittal MRI. This study investigated the appropriateness of using the mid-sagittal MRI to measure various phenotypes of age-related disc degeneration.

Methods: Lumbar spine MRIs of 66 subjects (mean age 50.3 years, standard deviation 16.5 years, range 22-84 years) were studied. An image analysis program Spine Explorer was used to obtain quantitative measurements for disc height, bulging, and signal on para- and mid-sagittal T2-weighted MRIs. Measurements on para- and mid-sagittal MRIs and their associations with age were compared.

Results: Measurements of disc height, signal, and posterior disc bulging acquired on the mid-sagittal MRI were greater than those on the para-sagittal MRIs. Disc height measurements were not linearly associated with age. Greater age was correlated with greater anterior (r = 0.45, P < 0.001) and posterior (r = 0.33, P < 0.01) bulging on para-sagittal MRIs, but not posterior disc bulging on the mid-sagittal MRI (r = - 0.10, P > 0.05). Disc signal intensity measurements on the mid-sagittal MRI had stronger correlations with age than those on para-sagittal MRIs. Mean and standard deviation of disc signal intensity acquired on the mid-sagittal MRI had the strongest correlations with age among all measures of disc degeneration studied (r = - 0.50, - 0.67, respectively, P < 0.001 for both).

Conclusions: Disc signal measurements acquired on the mid-sagittal MRI were reliable and had strong correlations with age and thus can be used as an appropriate measure of disc degeneration. Disc bulging had better be measured on para-sagittal MRIs. Although severe disc narrowing clearly is a sign of severe disc degeneration, disc height was not linearly associated with age.

Citing Articles

Lumbar Intervertebral Disc and Discovertebral Segment, Part 1: An Imaging Review of Normal Anatomy.

Theodorou D, Theodorou S, Gelalis I, Kakitsubata Y Cureus. 2022; 14(6):e25558.

PMID: 35784982 PMC: 9249043. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25558.


ISSLS prize in clinical science 2022: accelerated disc degeneration after pubertal growth spurt differentiates adults with low back pain from their asymptomatic peers.

Aavikko A, Lohman M, Ristolainen L, Kautiainen H, Osterman K, Schlenzka D Eur Spine J. 2022; 31(5):1080-1087.

PMID: 35333957 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07184-0.


Quantitative assessment of the lumbar intervertebral disc via T2 shows excellent long-term reliability.

Belavy D, Owen P, Armbrecht G, Bansmann M, Zange J, Ling Y PLoS One. 2021; 16(4):e0249855.

PMID: 33852631 PMC: 8046347. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249855.


New MR-based measures for the evaluation of age-related lumbar paraspinal muscle degeneration.

Hu X, Feng Z, Shen H, Zhang W, Huang J, Zheng Q Eur Spine J. 2021; 30(9):2577-2585.

PMID: 33740145 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06811-6.


Feasibility of Deep Learning Algorithms for Reporting in Routine Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Lewandrowski K, Muraleedharan N, Eddy S, Sobti V, Reece B, Leon J Int J Spine Surg. 2020; 14(s3):S86-S97.

PMID: 33298549 PMC: 7735442. DOI: 10.14444/7131.


References
1.
Videman T, Gibbons L, Battie M . Age- and pathology-specific measures of disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(25):2781-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817e1d11. View

2.
Jarman J, Arpinar V, Baruah D, Klein A, Maiman D, Tugan Muftuler L . Intervertebral disc height loss demonstrates the threshold of major pathological changes during degeneration. Eur Spine J. 2014; 24(9):1944-50. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3564-8. View

3.
Boos N, Weissbach S, Rohrbach H, Weiler C, Spratt K, Nerlich A . Classification of age-related changes in lumbar intervertebral discs: 2002 Volvo Award in basic science. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(23):2631-44. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200212010-00002. View

4.
Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Luukkonen R, Raininko R, Viikari-Juntura E, Lamminen A . Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(4):487-92. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200002150-00016. View

5.
Duran S, Cavusoglu M, Hatipoglu H, Sozmen Ciliz D, Sakman B . Association Between Measures of Vertebral Endplate Morphology and Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2017; 68(2):210-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2016.11.002. View